I'm having trouble with some valarray function pointer code:
double (*fp)(double) = sin;
valarray<double> (*fp)(const valarray<double> &) = sin;
The first compiles, the second gives:
error: no matches converting function 'sin' to type 'class std::valarray<double> (*)(const class std::valarray<double>&)'
This compiles, using the __typeof__
GCC extension. Looks like GCC's valarray
uses expression templates to delay calculation of the sinus. But that will make the return type of the sin
template not exactly valarray<T>
, but rather some weird complex type.
#include <valarray>
template<typename T> struct id { typedef T type; };
int main() {
using std::valarray;
using std::sin;
id<__typeof__(sin(valarray<double>()))>::type (*fp)(const valarray<double> &) = sin;
}
Edit: See AProgrammer's standard quote for why GCC is fine doing that.
Edit: Standard compliant workaround
Doing this without __typeof__
in a strictly Standard conforming way is a bit tricky. You will need to get the return type of sin
. You can use the conditional operator for this, as Eric Niebler has shown. It works by having the sin
function not actually called, but only type-checked. By trying to convert the other branch (the one which is actually evaluated) of the conditional operator to that same type, we can generate a dummy parameter just to be able to deduce the type of the function pointer:
#include <valarray>
using std::valarray;
template<typename T> struct id {
typedef T type;
};
struct ded_ty {
template<typename T>
operator id<T>() { return id<T>(); }
};
template<typename E, typename T>
id<T(*)(valarray<E> const&)> genFTy(T t) {
return id<T(*)(valarray<E> const&)>();
}
template<typename T>
void work(T fp, id<T>) {
// T is the function pointer type, fp points
// to the math function.
}
int main() {
work(std::sin, 1 ? ded_ty() : genFTy<double>(std::sin(valarray<double>())));
}
If you want to get the address right away, you can write work
so it returns fp
again.
template<typename T>
T addy(T fp, id<T>) { return fp; }
Now, you can finally write a macro to encapsulate the conditional operator trickery, and use it when you want to get the address of any such math function.
#define DEDUCE(FN,Y) (1 ? ded_ty() : genFTy<Y>(FN(std::valarray<Y>())))
To get the address and pass it to some generic function, the following works then
std::transform(v1.begin(), v1.end(), v1.begin(),
addy(std::sin, DEDUCE(std::sin, double)));
std::transform(v2.begin(), v2.end(), v2.begin(),
addy(std::cos, DEDUCE(std::cos, double)));
26 3.1/3
Any function returning a valarray is permitted to return an object of another type, provided all the const member functions of valarray are also applicable to this type.
The aim is to allow template expressions to be used to optimize the result (i.e. looping one time on the whole array doing each times the computation, directly assigning to the resulting valarray<> instead of building a temporary).
z = sin(x+y);
can be optimized to
for (i = 0; i < N; ++i)
z[i] = sin(x[i] + y[i]);
You speak about std::sin
in the title, but then assign ::sin
.
valarray<double> (*fp)(const valarray<double> &) = std::sin;
That should work. Note, that you should qualify all uses of sin
, though most implementations will inject the name to the global namespace even if you include <cmath>
(that is non-standard behavior).
Edit: unfortunately, you're out of luck. The standard says about sin(valarray<T> const &)
the following (26.3.3.3).
This function shall return a value which is of type T or which can be unambiguously converted to type T.
Optimizations performed by gcc are granted by the standard. The code above is not guaranteed to work.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With