Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

How do I perform iterator computations over iterators of Results without collecting to a temporary vector?

Tags:

iterator

rust

I'm looking for a way to eliminate the temporary vector allocation in this example:

fn doit<T: Iterator<Item = Result<i32, &'static str>>>(name: &str, iter: T) {
    println!(
        "{}: {:?}",
        name,
        iter.collect::<Result<Vec<_>, _>>()
            .map(|v| v.into_iter().min())
    );
}

fn main() {
    let without_errors = vec![Ok(1), Ok(2), Ok(3)];
    let with_errors = vec![Ok(1), Err("error"), Ok(2)];

    doit("without errors", without_errors.into_iter());
    doit("with errors", with_errors.into_iter());
}

This is a variation of the iterator with error handling theme, except that I don't want to create a collection (so collect() doesn't quite do the job), but I want to perform further operations on the elements being iterated over.

Note that this gives the wrong result because Ok is less than Err:

fn doit<T: Iterator<Item = Result<i32, &'static str>>>(name: &str, iter: T) {
    println!("{}: {:?}", name, iter.min());
}

It would give the right result for max() by accident, but it would not stop iterating on the first error.

like image 971
Florian Weimer Avatar asked Feb 17 '18 12:02

Florian Weimer


Video Answer


2 Answers

Iterator::try_fold provides the framework for what you need, and it's available since Rust 1.27 (Playground):

fn fold_ok<I, T, E, F>(mut iter: I, f: F) -> Result<Option<T>, E>
where
    I: Iterator<Item = Result<T, E>>,
    T: Ord,
    F: Fn(T, T) -> T,
{
    iter.try_fold(None, |r, i| {
        let i = i?;
        Ok(Some(if let Some(r) = r { f(r, i) } else { i }))
    })
}

fn main() {
    let without_errors = vec![Ok(1), Ok(2), Ok(3)];
    let with_errors = vec![Ok(1), Err("error"), Ok(2)];

    fn doit<'r, T>(name: &str, iter: T)
    where
        T: Iterator<Item = &'r Result<i32, &'static str>> + Clone,
    {
        println!("{}: {:?}", name, fold_ok(iter.cloned(), ::std::cmp::min));
    }

    doit("without errors", without_errors.iter());
    doit("with errors", with_errors.iter());
}

Before that, I think your only option is manually iterating (Playground)

fn fold_ok<I, T, E, F>(mut iter: I, f: F) -> Result<Option<T>, E>
where
    I: Iterator<Item = Result<T, E>>,
    T: Ord,
    F: Fn(T, T) -> T,
{
    let mut result = match iter.next() {
        None => return Ok(None),
        Some(r) => r?,
    };

    for item in iter {
        result = f(result, item?);
    }

    Ok(Some(result))
}

fn main() {
    let without_errors = vec![Ok(1), Ok(2), Ok(3)];
    let with_errors = vec![Ok(1), Err("error"), Ok(2)];

    fn doit<'r, T>(name: &str, iter: T)
    where
        T: Iterator<Item = &'r Result<i32, &'static str>> + Clone,
    {
        println!(
            "{}: {:?}",
            name,
            fold_ok(iter.clone().cloned(), ::std::cmp::min)
        );
    }

    doit("without errors", without_errors.iter());
    doit("with errors", with_errors.iter());
}
like image 109
Stefan Avatar answered Oct 21 '22 09:10

Stefan


"Lifting" a function to handle an iterator of results is a fairly common pattern and, as usual, itertools has a solution — process_results:

use itertools; // 0.8.0

fn doit(name: &str, iter: impl Iterator<Item = Result<i32, &'static str>>) {
    let min = itertools::process_results(iter, |i| i.min());
    println!("{}: {:?}", name, min);
}

This code began life as ResultShunt in the standard library before being extracted to itertools. It's what underlies the implementation of sum and product for iterators of Result.

like image 5
Shepmaster Avatar answered Oct 21 '22 10:10

Shepmaster