How can I pass a lambda to hash.each
, so I can re-use some code?
> h = { a: 'b' }
> h.each do |key, value| end
=> {:a=>"b"}
> test = lambda do |key, value| puts "#{key} = #{value}" end
> test.call('a','b')
a = b
> h.each &test
ArgumentError: wrong number of arguments (1 for 2)
from (irb):1:in `block in irb_binding'
from (irb):5:in `each'
from (irb):5
from /Users/jstillwell/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p362/bin/irb:16:in `<main>'
> h.each test
ArgumentError: wrong number of arguments(1 for 0)
from (irb):8:in `each'
from (irb):8
from /Users/jstillwell/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p362/bin/irb:16:in `<main>'
each
yields the current element to the block, ergo the lambda needs to take one argument, not two. In case of a Hash
the element being yielded is a two-element Array
with the first element being the key and the second element being the value.
test = lambda do |el| puts "#{el.first} = #{el.last}" end
h.each &test
# a = b
Alternatively, you can use Ruby's support for destructuring bind in parameter lists:
test = lambda do |(k, v)| puts "#{k} = #{v}" end
h.each &test
# a = b
Or, instead of using a lambda
which has the same argument binding semantics as a method, you could use a Proc
, which has the same argument binding semantics as a block, i.e. it will unpack a single Array
argument into multiple parameter bindings:
test = proc do |k, v| puts "#{k} = #{v}" end
h.each &test
# a = b
I still feel this is inconsistent syntax, I found the answer (but no apology) in another question Inconsistency of arity between Hash.each and lambdas
I switched it to
lambda do |(key, value)|
then I can pass in
hash.each &test
or I can call it directly with
test.call([key, value])
If someone has a better answer, or at least a succinct excuse why this is necessary. I'll gladly give them the points.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With