Let's say I've got a Ruby class in my Rails project that is setting an instance variable.
class Something
  def self.objects
    @objects ||= begin
      # some logic that builds an array, which is ultimately stored in @objects
    end
  end
end
Is it possible that @objects could be set multiple times?  Is it possible that during one request, while executing code between the begin/end above, that this method could be called during a second request?  This really comes down to a question of how Rails server instances are forked, I suppose.
Should I instead be using a Mutex or thread synchronization? e.g.:
class Something
  def self.objects
    return @objects if @objects
    Thread.exclusive do
      @objects ||= begin
        # some logic that builds an array, which is ultimately stored in @objects
      end
    end
  end
end
                It's possible (and desirable) to run Rails in a multi-threaded mode even in MRI. This can be accomplished by changing a line in production.rb.
config.threadsafe!
In MRI, two threads cannot run code simultaneously, but a context switch can happen at any time. In Rubinius and JRuby, threads can run code simultaneously.
Let's look at the code you showed:
class Something
  def self.objects
    @objects ||= begin
      # some logic that builds an array, which is ultimately stored in @objects
    end
  end
end
The ||= code gets expanded to something like:
class Something
  def self.objects
    @objects || (@objects = begin
      # some logic that builds an array, which is ultimately stored in @objects
    end)
  end
end
This means that there are actually two steps to the process:
@objects
@objects is falsy, set @objects to the results of the begin/end expressionIt may be possible for the context to switch between these steps. It is certainly possible for the context to switch in the middle of step 2. This means that you may end up running the block multiple times instead of once. In MRI, this may be acceptable, but it's perfectly straight forward to lock a mutex around the expression, so do it.
class Something
  MUTEX = Mutex.new
  def self.objects
    MUTEX.synchronize do
      @objects ||= begin
        # some logic that builds an array, which is ultimately stored in @objects
      end
    end
  end
end
                        I'll take a stab.
Rails is single-threaded.  Successive requests to a Rails application are either queued or handled by separate application instances (read: processes).  The value of the class instance variable @objects defined in your Something class exists within scope of the process, not within the scope of any instance of your application.
Therefore a mutex would be unnecessary as you would never encounter the case where two processes are accessing the same resource because the memory spaces of the two processes are entirely separate.
I think this raises another question, is @objects intended to be a shared resource, if so I think it needs to be implemented differently.
Disclaimer: I may be completely off the mark here, in fact I sort of hope I am so I can learn something today :)
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With