I'm trying to integrate a Lift application into some existing Java code. In one of my snippets, I have an Array of Java objects that I need to map that into a NodeSeq. I can get an Array of Node's, but not a NodeSeq. (At least, not in very functional-looking way).
import scala.xml.NodeSeq
// pretend this is code I can't do anything about
val data = Array("one", "two", "three")
// this is the function I need to write
def foo: NodeSeq = data.map { s => <x>{s}</x> }
// ^
// error: type mismatch;
// found : Array[scala.xml.Elem]
// required: scala.xml.NodeSeq
What's the cleanest way to do this?
scala> import collection.breakOut
import collection.breakOut
scala> def foo: NodeSeq = data.map { s => <x>{s}</x> }(breakOut)
foo: scala.xml.NodeSeq
The method map actually has two argument lists. The first accepts a function, which you passed. The second accepts a CanBuildFrom object which is used to create a builder that then builds the returning sequence. This argument is implicit, so usually the compiler fills it for you. It accepts 3 type parameters: From, T, To. There are several predef implicits (including in object NodeSeq), but none of them matches From=Array, T=Node, To=NodeSeq.
breakOut solves this: it is a generic method that returns a CanBuildFrom instance by searching for an implicit CanBuildFrom[Nothing, T, To]. According to the implicit search rules, any CanBuildFrom that matches T, To and has From > Nothing is acceptable. In this case: canBuildFrom in object Array
I would simply convert map
output to sequence (given that Seq[Node]
is a super-class of NodeSeq
)
scala> def foo: NodeSeq = data.map { s => <x>{s}</x> } toSeq
foo: scala.xml.NodeSeq
or use foldLeft
instead of map
scala> def foo: NodeSeq = (Seq[Node]() /: data) {(seq, node)=> seq ++ <x>{node}</x>}
foo: scala.xml.NodeSeq
You are looking for this method on the NodeSeq companion object.
NodeSeq.fromSeq(s: Seq[Node])
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With