If I have a class marked as a DataContract
and a few properties on it marked with DataMember
attributes I can serialize it out to XML easily, but it would create output like:
<Person>
<Name>John Smith</Name>
<Email>[email protected]</Email>
<Phone>123-123-1234</Phone>
</Person>
What I would prefer is attributes, like...
<Person Name="John Smith" Email="[email protected]" Phone="123-123-1234" />
The DataMember
attribute allows me to control the Name and Order but not whether it is serialized as an element or attribute. I have looked around and found DataContractFormat
and IXmlSerializable
but I am hoping there is there an easier solution.
What is the easiest way to do this?
The DataContractSerializer fully supports this serialization programming model that was used by . NET Framework remoting, the BinaryFormatter, and the SoapFormatter, including support for the ISerializable interface. Types that represent raw XML or types that represent ADO.NET relational data.
[DataContract] attribute specifies the data, which is to serialize (in short conversion of structured data into some format like Binary, XML etc.) and deserialize(opposite of serialization) in order to exchange between the client and the Service.
Hence, private variables are not serialized. You cannot serialize private members using XmlSerializer unless your class implements the interface IXmlSerializable.
XmlSerializer gives more control over the generated xml structure compared to the DataContractSerializer. For ex, if a field should come as an attribute or element. 10. XmlSerializer cannot able to serialize types that implements IDictionary, for ex.
You can do this with the DataContractSerializer - the answer is to take over the Xml serialization yourself by implementing the IXmlSerializable interface. For write-only support - you can leave the implementation of ReadXml empty, and return null for GetSchema, and then write the implementation of WriteXml as follows:
public class MyPerson : IXmlSerializable
{
public string Name { get; set;}
public string Email { get; set;}
public string Phone { get; set;}
public XmlSchema GetSchema() { return null; }
public void ReadXml(XmlReader reader) { }
public void WriteXml(XmlWriter writer)
{
writer.WriteAttributeString("name", Name);
writer.WriteAttributeString("email", Email);
writer.WriteAttributeString("phone", Phone);
}
}
If you're using the same type for, say, JSON serialization as well, then you are still free to add the DataContract and DataMember attributes - the DataContractSerializer will utilise the IXmlSerializable interface implementation only when writing Xml.
I blogged about this here.
You can't do this with the DataContractSerializer
; if you want attributes you need to use the XmlSerializer
instead. With the DataContractSerializer
class a more restrictive subset of the XML specification is permitted which improves performance, and improves the interoperability of published services, but gives you rather less control over the XML format.
If you're using WCF services then take a look at XmlSerializerFormatAttribute
which allows you to use the XmlSerializer
for serialization.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With