Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

How can you control .NET DataContract serialization so it uses XML attributes instead of elements?

If I have a class marked as a DataContract and a few properties on it marked with DataMember attributes I can serialize it out to XML easily, but it would create output like:

<Person>
    <Name>John Smith</Name>
    <Email>[email protected]</Email>
    <Phone>123-123-1234</Phone>
</Person>

What I would prefer is attributes, like...

<Person Name="John Smith" Email="[email protected]" Phone="123-123-1234" />

The DataMember attribute allows me to control the Name and Order but not whether it is serialized as an element or attribute. I have looked around and found DataContractFormat and IXmlSerializable but I am hoping there is there an easier solution.

What is the easiest way to do this?

like image 620
Brennan Avatar asked Feb 26 '09 18:02

Brennan


People also ask

Which of the following forms of serialized XML is supported by the DataContractSerializer?

The DataContractSerializer fully supports this serialization programming model that was used by . NET Framework remoting, the BinaryFormatter, and the SoapFormatter, including support for the ISerializable interface. Types that represent raw XML or types that represent ADO.NET relational data.

What is DataContract attribute?

[DataContract] attribute specifies the data, which is to serialize (in short conversion of structured data into some format like Binary, XML etc.) and deserialize(opposite of serialization) in order to exchange between the client and the Service.

Can we serialize private variable in C#?

Hence, private variables are not serialized. You cannot serialize private members using XmlSerializer unless your class implements the interface IXmlSerializable.

What is DataContractSerializer and how its different from XmlSerializer?

XmlSerializer gives more control over the generated xml structure compared to the DataContractSerializer. For ex, if a field should come as an attribute or element. 10. XmlSerializer cannot able to serialize types that implements IDictionary, for ex.


2 Answers

You can do this with the DataContractSerializer - the answer is to take over the Xml serialization yourself by implementing the IXmlSerializable interface. For write-only support - you can leave the implementation of ReadXml empty, and return null for GetSchema, and then write the implementation of WriteXml as follows:

public class MyPerson : IXmlSerializable
{
  public string Name { get; set;}
  public string Email { get; set;}
  public string Phone { get; set;}

  public XmlSchema GetSchema() { return null; }
  public void ReadXml(XmlReader reader) { }
  public void WriteXml(XmlWriter writer)
  { 
    writer.WriteAttributeString("name", Name);
    writer.WriteAttributeString("email", Email);
    writer.WriteAttributeString("phone", Phone);
  } 
}

If you're using the same type for, say, JSON serialization as well, then you are still free to add the DataContract and DataMember attributes - the DataContractSerializer will utilise the IXmlSerializable interface implementation only when writing Xml.

I blogged about this here.

like image 85
Andras Zoltan Avatar answered Sep 20 '22 17:09

Andras Zoltan


You can't do this with the DataContractSerializer; if you want attributes you need to use the XmlSerializer instead. With the DataContractSerializer class a more restrictive subset of the XML specification is permitted which improves performance, and improves the interoperability of published services, but gives you rather less control over the XML format.

If you're using WCF services then take a look at XmlSerializerFormatAttribute which allows you to use the XmlSerializer for serialization.

like image 39
Greg Beech Avatar answered Sep 19 '22 17:09

Greg Beech