Menu
I need to fake HttpContext.Current.Application table in order to access it from my unit tests.
I need to store my data somewhere. I thought that I can just pass instance of NameValueCollectionBase but as I discovered this base type has no indexer so it seems too complicated to use.
So what about faking this part of HttpContext? Is it possible? How can I make it? Will be NUnit.Mocks helpful?
Thank you in advance...
572
HttpContextMock is an implementation of AspNetCore. Http. HttpContext that stores a Mock<HttpContext> instance and works as a proxy for the real Mock. The HttpContextMock constructor initializes a Mock for Request, Response, Header and etc to work as a proxy as well.
Advanced: Mocking in Unit TestMocking is used in unit tests to replace the return value of a class method or function. This may seem counterintuitive since unit tests are supposed to test the class method or function, but we are replacing all those processing and setting a predefined output.
It stores the request and response information, such as the properties of request, request-related services, and any data to/from the request or errors, if there are any. ASP.NET Core applications access the HTTPContext through the IHttpContextAccessor interface. The HttpContextAccessor class implements it.
Generally, no. A unit test should be used to test for the functionality of a unit. You should unit test methods on a class, not individual, automatic properties (unless you are overriding the getter or setter with custom behaviour).
Please go through below links it will help you.
http://www.java2s.com/Open-Source/CSharp/Web-Frameworks/MvcContrib/MvcContrib/TestHelper/Fakes/FakeHttpContext.cs.htm
Mocking and HttpContextBase.get_User()
Thanks Venkat
114
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With
