One of my tables have a unique key and when I try to insert a duplicate record it throws an exception as expected. But I need to distinguish unique key exceptions from others, so that I can customize the error message for unique key constraint violations.
All the solutions I've found online suggests to cast ex.InnerException
to System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException
and check the if Number
property is equal to 2601 or 2627 as follows:
try { _context.SaveChanges(); } catch (Exception ex) { var sqlException = ex.InnerException as System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException; if (sqlException.Number == 2601 || sqlException.Number == 2627) { ErrorMessage = "Cannot insert duplicate values."; } else { ErrorMessage = "Error while saving data."; } }
But the problem is, casting ex.InnerException
to System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException
causes invalid cast error since ex.InnerException
is actually type of System.Data.Entity.Core.UpdateException
, not System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException
.
What is the problem with the code above? How can I catch Unique Key Constraint violations?
To handle unique constraint violations: Catch uniqueness exceptions thrown by the database at the lowest level possible — in the UnitOfWork class. Convert them into Result. Use the UnitOfWork in the controller to explicitly commit pending changes and see if there are any uniqueness constraint violations.
Syntax error in the SQL statement may result in SQL Exception. When such an exception occurs, an object of the SQLException class will be passed to the catch block. By using the information in the SQLException object, we can catch that exception and continue the program.
The exception that is thrown when SQL Server returns a warning or error. This class cannot be inherited.
With EF6 and the DbContext
API (for SQL Server), I'm currently using this piece of code:
try { // Some DB access } catch (Exception ex) { HandleException(ex); } public virtual void HandleException(Exception exception) { if (exception is DbUpdateConcurrencyException concurrencyEx) { // A custom exception of yours for concurrency issues throw new ConcurrencyException(); } else if (exception is DbUpdateException dbUpdateEx) { if (dbUpdateEx.InnerException != null && dbUpdateEx.InnerException.InnerException != null) { if (dbUpdateEx.InnerException.InnerException is SqlException sqlException) { switch (sqlException.Number) { case 2627: // Unique constraint error case 547: // Constraint check violation case 2601: // Duplicated key row error // Constraint violation exception // A custom exception of yours for concurrency issues throw new ConcurrencyException(); default: // A custom exception of yours for other DB issues throw new DatabaseAccessException( dbUpdateEx.Message, dbUpdateEx.InnerException); } } throw new DatabaseAccessException(dbUpdateEx.Message, dbUpdateEx.InnerException); } } // If we're here then no exception has been thrown // So add another piece of code below for other exceptions not yet handled... }
As you mentioned UpdateException
, I'm assuming you're using the ObjectContext
API, but it should be similar.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With