I am wondering why in the following example the top and bottom padding has no affect on the anchor tag while the left and right does?
<ul id="nav">
<li><a href="#">One</a></li>
<li><a href="#">Two</a></li>
<li><a href="#">Three</a></li>
<li><a href="#">Four</a></li>
<li><a href="#">Five</a></li>
</ul>
#nav{
list-style:none;
}
#nav li{
border:1px solid #666;
display:inline;
/*If you do it this way you need to set the top and bottom
padding to be the same here as under #nav li a
padding:8px 0; */
}
#nav li a{
padding:8px 16px;
}
Example: Link
So my main question is, why does the top and bottom padding not have an effect on the list items while the left and right do?
I did try this out with a float instead of a display:inline on the list item and it worked as I expected it to. So I guess if I had a secondary question it would be what is the difference between a float:left; and a display:inline? I was reading the float spec and it sounds like a float is still a box online inline so somewhat like inline-block?
I appreciate any input, this isn't really something I need to know to finish a project or anything, but I would like to know why.
Thanks
Levi
Anchor links ( a elements) are inline elements, they can't have paddings. Making them inline-block must work.
It is always display: inline by default. Horizontal margins, and padding on all sides should work without having to change its display property.
An anchor is an inline element by default so you can't add dimensions to it unless you change its display property.
Anchors are inline elements. Only block level elements can have top/bottom attributes changed.
You can override by doing:
a
{
display: block;
float: left;
}
The float is neccessary because block level elements take up the entire width of the container they're in. You'll have to write some extra rules to clear it at some point. Either way, have a play about to see how it works.
An obscure corner of the CSS spec actually points out that display: block
is an unnecessary companion to float: left
.
The reason for the pointless padding is... inline elements. Interesting fact: inline elements will take padding values, but that padding won't affect the layout of surrounding content.
To get the desired results given the markup and styles above, I would suggest simply changing the display
value of the li
elements to inline-block
and using a line-height
value or position: relative
etc. to control the vertical composition of the links while confining all of your box values to the list items.
The older the browser, the buggier these styles will be; details on that could go on for several paragraphs.
There are three support issues to remember when working with solutions like these:
display: inline-block
is only applied to elements that have a runtime display
value of inline
. The HTML4 spec can help you tell the sheep from the goats on that one.inline-block
value, but does have a -moz-inline-block
CSS extension.If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With