just wondering when it comes to just the basic GET/POST. (i.e something simple as getting the users profile and not something complicated like getting a pictures from every album)
which is faster? Graph or FQL.
i know FQL is newer than graph, but unsure if its more efficient.
It's in no way comparable like this. While you can get same data (in some cases) from both their intents are completely different: FQL is a query language, Graph is an API.
Calling to FQL query if using new JS SDK is a Graph API call itself...
You can (and probably should, if you worry about real comparison and not theoretical speculation) compare speed of calls returning same data but you should take into account some things:
Field Expansion
Consider following example from FQL documentation, subquery that fetches all user information for the active user and friends:
SELECT uid, name, pic_square FROM user WHERE uid = me()
OR uid IN (SELECT uid2 FROM friend WHERE uid1 = me())
This simply not possible to achieve with a single Graph API call. (see Update)
Once you define desired subset of data to get you can choose appropriate method of retrieval based on your requirements.
BTW, FQL is much older than Graph, we had it aside to FBML (rip) and FBJS (rip)
Update:
Graph API providing way for Batch Requests and specifying dependencies between operations in the request. For example same sample as above can be achieved in a single call to Graph API
POST https://graph.facebook.com/
POST Data:
batch=[
{
"method": "GET",
"name" : "get-friends",
"relative_url": "me/friends?fields=id",
},
{
"method": "GET",
"relative_url": "?ids={result=get-friends:$.data.*.id}&fields=id,name,picture"
}
]
Update 2:
As of 30 August 2012 Graph API is also support Field Expansion as additional (very powerful) mechanism of data retrieval (including nested data)
I ran a simple test (getting the cover photo id) using the PHP SDK :
public $microtime_start = 0;
public function getExecutionTime() {
return round(microtime(true) - $this->microtime_start, 4);
}
public function getFQL($request, $filter = true, $multiFilter = true) {
if(is_array($request)) {
$query = '{';
foreach ($request as $key => $q) {
$query .= '"'.urlencode($key).'":"'.urlencode(addslashes($q)).'",';
}
$query = substr($query, 0, -1).'}';
$data = $this->callAPI('/fql?q=' . $query);
if($filter) {
$data = $data['data'];
if($multiFilter) {
$data = $data[count($data)-1]['fql_result_set'];
}
return $data;
}
} else {
$data = $this->callAPI('/fql?q=' . urlencode($request));
if($filter) {
return $data['data'];
}
}
}
public function callAPI($path) {
$params = array('access_token' => $this->getAccessToken());
return $this->api($path, 'GET', $params);
}
public function getCoverPhotoId($uid) {
$time = $this->getExecutionTime();
$albums = $this->api("/me/albums");
$album_id = "";
foreach ($albums["data"] as $item) {
if ($item["name"] == "Cover Photos") {
$album_id = $item["id"];
$profile_picture_id = $item["cover_photo"];
break;
}
}
$time2 = $this->getExecutionTime();
echo 'graph api: '.($time2 - $time).'<br/>';
$data = $this->getFQL(array(
'query1' => 'SELECT cover_object_id FROM album WHERE owner = ' . $uid.' AND name = "Cover Photos"'
));
$time3 = $this->getExecutionTime();
echo 'graph api with FQL: '.($time3 - $time2).'<br/>';
$data = $this->api(
array(
'method' => 'fql.query',
'query' => 'SELECT cover_object_id FROM album WHERE owner = ' . $uid.' AND name = "Cover Photos"'
)
);
$time4 = $this->getExecutionTime();
echo 'FQL via rest api: '.($time4 - $time3).'<br/>';
}
Results :
graph api: 1.28320002556
graph api with FQL: 0.744100093842
FQL via rest api: 0.544199943542
The basic FQL is much faster, the FQL via graph api is ok, but graph api is waaay too slow... And you will get a bunch of useless stuff with the graph api
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With