The Gnu C++ compiler seems to define __cplusplus
to be 1
#include <iostream> int main() { std::cout << __cplusplus << std::endl; }
This prints 1
with gcc in standard c++ mode, as well as in C++0x mode, with gcc 4.3.4, and gcc 4.7.0.
The C++11 FDIS says in "16.8 Predefined macro names [cpp.predefined]" that
The name
__cplusplus
is defined to the value 201103L when compiling a C++ translation unit. (Footnote: It is intended that future versions of this standard will replace the value of this macro with a greater value. Non-conforming com- pilers should use a value with at most five decimal digits.)
The old std C++03 had a similar rule.
Is the GCC deliberatly setting this to 1
, because it is "non-conforming"?
By reading through that list I thought that I could use __cplusplus
to check in a portable way if I have a C++11 enabled compiler. But with g++ this does not seem to work. I know about the ...EXPERIMENTAL...
macro, but got curious why g++ is defining __cplusplus
this way.
My original problem was switch between different null-pointer-variants. Something like this:
#if __cplusplus > 201100L # define MYNULL nullptr #else # define MYNULL NULL #endif
Is there a simple and reasonably portable way to implement such a switch?
This was fixed about a month ago (for gcc 4.7.0). The bug report makes for an interesting read: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With