Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Get specific bit from uint32

I have a UInt32 variable like 3238844000.

Now I want to get the first two bits of this number and the 6 bits after the first two bits. Both bits should be int.

Decimal: 3238844000
Binary:  11000001000011001101011001100000
         ^^

and

Decimal: 3238844000
Binary:  11000001000011001101011001100000
           ^^^^^^ 
like image 392
Philies Avatar asked Jan 18 '16 08:01

Philies


People also ask

How to get specific bits in C?

For accessing a specific bit, you can use Shift Operators . If it is always a 1 that you are going to reset, then you could use an & operation. But, if it can also take 0 value, then & operation will fail as 0 & 1 = 0 . You could use | (OR) during that time.

How do you extract K bits from a given position P in a number?

How to extract 'k' bits from a given position 'p' in a number? Examples: Input : number = 171 k = 5 p = 2 Output : The extracted number is 21 171 is represented as 10101011 in binary, so, you should get only 10101 i.e. 21.

How do you set a specific bit?

Setting a bitUse the bitwise OR operator ( | ) to set a bit. number |= 1UL << n; That will set the n th bit of number . n should be zero, if you want to set the 1 st bit and so on upto n-1 , if you want to set the n th bit.

How do you set a specific bit in Python?

To set any bit we use bitwise OR | operator. As we already know bitwise OR | operator evaluates each bit of the result to 1 if any of the operand's corresponding bit is set (1).


1 Answers

Update 2:

The simplest (and also the fastest) way for this case turns out to be by purely using the bitwise-shift operators

int val = (int)(input >> 30); // performs the same 
int val2 = (int)((input << 2) >> 26); //the simplest and the fastest way

I have heard before that bitwise-shift operations tend to be faster. But today, out of curiosity*, I really compared the performance between bitwise-shift + mask ((int)((input & mask2) >> 24)) with bitwise-shift alone ((int)((input << 2) >> 26)). bitwise-shift alone operation is approximately faster by 10%-15%.

This is the result I got:

[2016-01-20 04:01:26.638 UTC] shift-mask: 235 ms    shift-only: 199 ms
[2016-01-20 04:01:30.402 UTC] shift-mask: 233 ms    shift-only: 200 ms
[2016-01-20 04:01:31.265 UTC] shift-mask: 233 ms    shift-only: 198 ms
[2016-01-20 04:01:32.116 UTC] shift-mask: 227 ms    shift-only: 199 ms
[2016-01-20 04:01:32.850 UTC] shift-mask: 233 ms    shift-only: 198 ms
[2016-01-20 04:01:33.584 UTC] shift-mask: 230 ms    shift-only: 199 ms
[2016-01-20 04:01:34.280 UTC] shift-mask: 263 ms    shift-only: 214 ms
[2016-01-20 04:01:35.055 UTC] shift-mask: 229 ms    shift-only: 201 ms
[2016-01-20 04:01:36.996 UTC] shift-mask: 234 ms    shift-only: 201 ms
[2016-01-20 04:01:37.933 UTC] shift-mask: 224 ms    shift-only: 198 ms
[2016-01-20 04:01:38.353 UTC] shift-mask: 222 ms    shift-only: 196 ms
[2016-01-20 04:01:38.798 UTC] shift-mask: 233 ms    shift-only: 211 ms
[2016-01-20 04:01:39.246 UTC] shift-mask: 235 ms    shift-only: 213 ms
[2016-01-20 04:01:39.668 UTC] shift-mask: 223 ms    shift-only: 198 ms
[2016-01-20 04:01:41.102 UTC] shift-mask: 234 ms    shift-only: 200 ms
[2016-01-20 04:01:41.524 UTC] shift-mask: 224 ms    shift-only: 198 ms
[2016-01-20 04:01:41.948 UTC] shift-mask: 223 ms    shift-only: 200 ms
[2016-01-20 04:01:42.373 UTC] shift-mask: 224 ms    shift-only: 200 ms
[2016-01-20 04:01:43.521 UTC] shift-mask: 233 ms    shift-only: 197 ms
[2016-01-20 04:01:44.272 UTC] shift-mask: 237 ms    shift-only: 216 ms
[2016-01-20 04:01:44.909 UTC] shift-mask: 231 ms    shift-only: 196 ms
[2016-01-20 04:01:45.353 UTC] shift-mask: 230 ms    shift-only: 213 ms
[2016-01-20 04:01:45.850 UTC] shift-mask: 237 ms    shift-only: 207 ms
[2016-01-20 04:01:46.276 UTC] shift-mask: 226 ms    shift-only: 200 ms
[2016-01-20 04:01:47.074 UTC] shift-mask: 234 ms    shift-only: 203 ms
[2016-01-20 04:01:47.718 UTC] shift-mask: 230 ms    shift-only: 199 ms
[2016-01-20 04:01:48.144 UTC] shift-mask: 226 ms    shift-only: 200 ms
[2016-01-20 04:01:48.567 UTC] shift-mask: 225 ms    shift-only: 198 ms
[2016-01-20 04:01:48.994 UTC] shift-mask: 225 ms    shift-only: 199 ms
[2016-01-20 04:01:49.429 UTC] shift-mask: 223 ms    shift-only: 211 ms
[2016-01-20 04:01:49.860 UTC] shift-mask: 232 ms    shift-only: 198 ms
[2016-01-20 04:01:50.284 UTC] shift-mask: 225 ms    shift-only: 199 ms

Note: each experiment is done for (5,000,000 x 100) operations.

*remembering my old days dealing with micro-controllers... ;)


Original:

Just like how you find binary representation for your UInt32, you should find the right bitwise mask in its binary representation too:

uint mask1 = 0xC0000000; //1100 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000
uint mask2 = 0x3F000000; //0011 1111 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 

And then use them with bitwise-and operator

To get the first two bits, you could simply use the mask like this:

uint val = input & mask1; //should give you the first two bits, the rests are zero

And to get the next 6 bits:

uint val2 = input & mask2; //similarly, should give you only the six bits in the position which you want

If you need them in int, then simply cast them:

int val = (int)(input & mask1);
int val2 = (int)(input & mask2);

And if you want to put the results in the LSB (the least significant byte, the rightmost 8-bit in this case), use bitwise right shift operator:

int val = (int)((input & mask1) >> 30); //30 bits are 0
int val2 = (int)((input & mask2) >> 24); //24 bits are 0

Update:

As for the above shifted version, actually, you could also simply bitwise right shift the first one and do almost similarly for the second, except that it would require a bitwise mask of 0x3F (0011 1111) to clear up the unwanted first two bits.

int val = (int)(input >> 30); // performs the same 
int val2 = (int)((input >> 24) & 0x3F); //the simpler way

What happen to them in the bit-representation is as follow (I give comments to ease following the logical flow):

The first one:

1100 0001 0000 1100 1101 0110 0110 0000
--------------------------------------- >> 30 //bitwise right shift by 30
0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0011 //you get only the first two bits, the rests are all replaced by 0

The second one:

1100 0001 0000 1100 1101 0110 0110 0000
--------------------------------------- >> 24 //bitwise right shift by 24
0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 1100 0001
                              0011 1111 //this is 0x3f
--------------------------------------- & //this is bitwise-and
0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0001 //you only get the 6 bits which you want

Thus you will get 3 (0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0011) for your first value, and get 1 (0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0001) for your second value.

Along with following the example above, I think you can get the idea on how to do this on many other different cases too.

like image 59
Ian Avatar answered Oct 11 '22 06:10

Ian