Let's say the iPhone is placed on a flat table. I'd like to determine the angle of the tabletop plane, where an angle of 0 would mean the table is exactly perpendicular to the gravity vector. I'm using the following formula:
radians = atanf (z / sqrt (x^2 + y^2)
in the .h
double accelerationXAverage;
double accelerationYAverage;
double accelerationZAverage;
double accelerationXSum;
double accelerationYSum;
double accelerationZSum;
int readingsCount;
in the .m
#define kThresholdMovementHigh 0.05
- (void)accelerometer:(UIAccelerometer *)accelerometer
didAccelerate:(UIAcceleration *)acceleration
{
// did device move a lot? if so, reset sums
if (fabsf(acceleration.x - accelerationXAverage) > kThresholdMovementHigh ||
fabsf(acceleration.y - accelerationYAverage) > kThresholdMovementHigh ||
fabsf(acceleration.z - accelerationZAverage) > kThresholdMovementHigh )
{
NSLog(@"deviceDidMove a lot");
accelerationXSum = acceleration.x;
accelerationYSum = acceleration.y;
accelerationZSum = acceleration.z;
readingsCount = 1;
}
else
{
// because the device is at rest, we can take an average of readings
accelerationXSum += acceleration.x;
accelerationYSum += acceleration.y;
accelerationZSum += acceleration.z;
readingsCount ++;
}
accelerationXAverage = accelerationXSum / readingsCount;
accelerationYAverage = accelerationYSum / readingsCount;
accelerationZAverage = accelerationZSum / readingsCount;
float angle = RadiansToDegrees(atanf(accelerationZAverage/sqrtf(pow(accelerationXAverage, 2) + pow(accelerationYAverage, 2)))) + 90;
labelAngle.text = [NSString stringWithFormat:@"%.2f°", angle];
}
I'm filtering out noise by averaging the accelerometer readings. The accelerometer update interval is 1/60, and for now while experimenting, I've let the device sit for 10 seconds (so it's an average of 600 readings).
This formula appears to work, it gives me angles about what I'd expect. However, I'm also expecting that if I try this with the device rotated to a different static position while still flat on the tabletop, that I should get the same answer (cause relative to the gravity vector, the angle hasn't changed). However, that's not what I get when I try it out. The angles vary by a couple of degrees.
I am using the right formula? Why would the angle differ for different placements on the same tabletop? Is it just the margin of error?
I've added an image (from http://gotoandplay.freeblog.hu/) to make sure I'm talking about the same x- y- and z- axis.
Your approach and formula are correct.
The x, y and z are relative to the device. Theoretically the angle should be the same irrespective of the angular position of the device on the table top. However there are several factors contributing to the accuracy here including the arctan computation at such a small angle. I would suggest you to try it out with the table inclination (not horizontal to the ground). Say keep your table at angle of 30 degrees from the ground and try out. I assume your x,y,z all are in double
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With