Being inspired by the solution to this question I tried using the same approach with XCTest.
I've set 'Generate Test Coverage Files=YES' and 'Instrument Program Flow=YES'.
XCode still doesn't produce any gcda files. Anyone have any ideas of how to solve this?
Code:
#import <XCTest/XCTestLog.h> @interface VATestObserver : XCTestLog @end static id mainSuite = nil; @implementation VATestObserver + (void)initialize { [[NSUserDefaults standardUserDefaults] setValue:@"VATestObserver" forKey:XCTestObserverClassKey]; [super initialize]; } - (void)testSuiteDidStart:(XCTestRun *)testRun { [super testSuiteDidStart:testRun]; XCTestSuiteRun *suite = [[XCTestSuiteRun alloc] init]; [suite addTestRun:testRun]; if (mainSuite == nil) { mainSuite = suite; } } - (void)testSuiteDidStop:(XCTestRun *)testRun { [super testSuiteDidStop:testRun]; XCTestSuiteRun *suite = [[XCTestSuiteRun alloc] init]; [suite addTestRun:testRun]; if (mainSuite == suite) { UIApplication* application = [UIApplication sharedApplication]; [application.delegate applicationWillTerminate:application]; } } @end
In AppDelegate.m I have:
extern void __gcov_flush(void); - (void)applicationWillTerminate:(UIApplication *)application { __gcov_flush(); }
EDIT: I edited the question to reflect the current status (without the red herrings).
EDIT To make it work I had to add the all the files under test to the test target including VATestObserver.
AppDelegate.m
#ifdef DEBUG + (void)initialize { if([self class] == [AppDelegate class]) { [[NSUserDefaults standardUserDefaults] setValue:@"VATestObserver" forKey:@"XCTestObserverClass"]; } } #endif
VATestObserver.m
#import <XCTest/XCTestLog.h> #import <XCTest/XCTestSuiteRun.h> #import <XCTest/XCTest.h> // Workaround for XCode 5 bug where __gcov_flush is not called properly when Test Coverage flags are set @interface VATestObserver : XCTestLog @end #ifdef DEBUG extern void __gcov_flush(void); #endif static NSUInteger sTestCounter = 0; static id mainSuite = nil; @implementation VATestObserver + (void)initialize { [[NSUserDefaults standardUserDefaults] setValue:@"VATestObserver" forKey:XCTestObserverClassKey]; [super initialize]; } - (void)testSuiteDidStart:(XCTestRun *)testRun { [super testSuiteDidStart:testRun]; XCTestSuiteRun *suite = [[XCTestSuiteRun alloc] init]; [suite addTestRun:testRun]; sTestCounter++; if (mainSuite == nil) { mainSuite = suite; } } - (void)testSuiteDidStop:(XCTestRun *)testRun { sTestCounter--; [super testSuiteDidStop:testRun]; XCTestSuiteRun *suite = [[XCTestSuiteRun alloc] init]; [suite addTestRun:testRun]; if (sTestCounter == 0) { __gcov_flush(); } }
Update 1:
After reading a bit more about this, 2 things have now become clear to me (emphasis added):
Tests and the tested application are compiled separately. Tests are actually injected into the running application, so the
__gcov_flush()
must be called inside the application not inside the tests.— Xcode5 Code Coverage (from cmd-line for CI builds) - Stack Overflow
and,
Again: Injection is complex. Your take away should be: Don’t add .m files from your app to your test target. You’ll get unexpected behavior.
— Testing View Controllers – #1 – Lighter View Controllers
The code below was changed to reflect these two insights…
Update 2:
Added information on how to make this work for static libraries, as requested by @MdaG in the comments. The main changes for libraries is that:
We can flush directly from the -stopObserving
method because there isn't a separate app where to inject the tests.
We must register the observer in the +load
method because by the time the +initialize
is called (when the class is first accessed from the test suite) it's already too late for XCTest to pick it up.
The other answers here have helped me immensely in setting up code coverage in my project. While exploring them, I believe I've managed to simplify the code for the fix quite a bit.
Considering either one of:
ExampleApp.xcodeproj
created from scratch as an "Empty Application"ExampleLibrary.xcodeproj
created as an independent "Cocoa Touch Static Library"These were the steps I took to enable Code Coverage generation in Xcode 5:
Create the GcovTestObserver.m
file with the following code, inside the ExampleAppTests group:
#import <XCTest/XCTestObserver.h> @interface GcovTestObserver : XCTestObserver @end @implementation GcovTestObserver - (void)stopObserving { [super stopObserving]; UIApplication* application = [UIApplication sharedApplication]; [application.delegate applicationWillTerminate:application]; } @end
When doing a library, since there is no app to call, the flush can be invoked directly from the observer. In that case, add the file to the ExampleLibraryTests group with this code instead:
#import <XCTest/XCTestObserver.h> @interface GcovTestObserver : XCTestObserver @end @implementation GcovTestObserver - (void)stopObserving { [super stopObserving]; extern void __gcov_flush(void); __gcov_flush(); } @end
To register the test observer class, add the following code to the @implementation
section of either one of:
ExampleAppDelegate.m
file, inside the ExampleApp groupExampleLibrary.m
file, inside the ExampleLibrary group
#ifdef DEBUG + (void)load { [[NSUserDefaults standardUserDefaults] setValue:@"XCTestLog,GcovTestObserver" forKey:@"XCTestObserverClass"]; } #endif
Previously, this answer suggested to use the +initialize
method (and you can still do that in case of Apps) but it doesn't work for libraries…
In the case of a library, the +initialize
will probably be executed only when the tests invoke the library code for the first time, and by then it's already too late to register the observer. Using the +load
method, the observer registration in always done in time, regardless of which scenario.
In the case of Apps, add the following code to the @implementation
section of the ExampleAppDelegate.m
file, inside the ExampleApp group, to flush the coverage files on exiting the app:
- (void)applicationWillTerminate:(UIApplication *)application { #ifdef DEBUG extern void __gcov_flush(void); __gcov_flush(); #endif }
Enable Generate Test Coverage Files
and Instrument Program Flow
by setting them to YES
in the project build settings (for both the "Example" and "Example Tests" targets).
To do this in an easy and consistent way, I've added a Debug.xcconfig
file associated with the project's "Debug" configuration, with the following declarations:
GCC_GENERATE_TEST_COVERAGE_FILES = YES GCC_INSTRUMENT_PROGRAM_FLOW_ARCS = YES
Make sure all the project's Don't do this: app code belongs to the app target, test code belongs to the test target!.m
files are also included in the "Compile Sources" build phase of the "Example Tests" target.
After running the tests for your project, you'l be able to find the generated coverage files for the Example.xcodeproj
in here:
cd ~/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/ find ./Example-* -name *.gcda
The method declaration inside XCTestObserver.h
indicates:
/*! Sent immediately after running tests to inform the observer that it's time to stop observing test progress. Subclasses can override this method, but they must invoke super's implementation. */ - (void) stopObserving;
By creating and registering a separate XCTestObserver
subclass, we avoid having to interfere directly with the default XCTestLog
class.
The constant key declaration inside XCTestObserver.h
suggests just that:
/*! Setting the XCTestObserverClass user default to the name of a subclass of XCTestObserver indicates that XCTest should use that subclass for reporting test results rather than the default, XCTestLog. You can specify multiple subclasses of XCTestObserver by specifying a comma between each one, for example @"XCTestLog,FooObserver". */ XCT_EXPORT NSString * const XCTestObserverClassKey;
Even though it's common practice to use if(self == [ExampleAppDelegate class])
around the code inside +initialize
[Note: it's now using +load
], I find it easier to omit it in this particular case: no need to adjust to the correct class name when doing copy & paste.
Also, the protection against running the code twice isn't really necessary here: this is not included in the release builds, and even if we subclass ExampleAppDelegate
there is no problem in running this code more than one.
In the case of libraries, the first hint of the problem came from this code comment in the Google Toolbox for Mac project: GTMCodeCovereageApp.m
+ (void)load { // Using defines and strings so that we don't have to link in XCTest here. // Must set defaults here. If we set them in XCTest we are too late // for the observer registration. // (...)
And as the NSObject Class Reference indicates:
initialize — Initializes the class before it receives its first message
load — Invoked whenever a class or category is added to the Objective-C runtime
In case someone tries to replicate this process by creating their own "EmptyLibrary" project, please bear in mind that you need to invoke the library code from the default emtpy tests somehow.
If the main library class is not invoked from the tests, the compiler will try to be smart and it won't add it to the runtime (since it's not being called anywhere), so the +load
method doesn't get called.
You can simply invoke some harmless method (as Apple suggests in their Coding Guidelines for Cocoa # Class Initialization). For example:
- (void)testExample { [ExampleLibrary self]; }
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With