Do you know any other reasons why a watchpoint could not be inserted other than too many hardware breakpoints/watchpoints?
I have the following debug session:
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.1
...
(gdb) watch itrap_t_beg[1][222]
Hardware watchpoint 1: itrap_t_beg[1][222]
(gdb) cont
Continuing.
...
Hardware watchpoint 1: itrap_t_beg[1][222]
...
(gdb) cont
Continuing.
Warning:
Could not insert hardware watchpoint 1.
Could not insert hardware breakpoints:
You may have requested too many hardware breakpoints/watchpoints.
(gdb) info break
Num Type Disp Enb Address What
1 hw watchpoint keep y itrap_t_beg[1][222]
breakpoint already hit 1 time
As you can see, there's only one watchpoint yet it can't insert the breakpoint.
Do you know how can I fix this?
Simply quit GDB, and all breakpoints and watchpoints will be gone. Or do (gdb) delete (without specifying a break point), and confirm that you want to delete all.
If GDB cannot set a hardware watchpoint, it sets a software watchpoint, which executes more slowly and reports the change in value at the next statement, not the instruction, after the change occurs. You can force GDB to use only software watchpoints with the set can-use-hw-watchpoints 0 command.
You can force GDB to use only software watchpoints with the set can-use-hw-watchpoints 0 command. With this variable set to zero, GDB will never try to use hardware watchpoints, even if the underlying system supports them.
As far as I know commodity x86 CPUs have four debug registers available for supporting hardware breaks/watches. This limits the object size that you can watch. Object alignment also plays here.
Try limiting the watch scope to a smaller object like pair of first and last members of the structure.
Can force software breakpoints (which do not have limit on size) by running
set can-use-hw-watchpoints 0
Shot answer: Use watch -location itrap_t_beg[1][222]
, or the short form watch -l
.
Long answer: Quoting the GDB manual:
Watching complex expressions that reference many variables can also exhaust the resources available for hardware-assisted watchpoints. That's because gdb needs to watch every variable in the expression with separately allocated resources.
gdb quite literally watches the expression itself, not whatever address it points to. In this case, it means that the breakpoint will hit if itrap_t_beg
itself is changed such that itrap_t_beg[1][222]
does; there's not just a watchpoint for itrap_t_beg[1][222]
, but also one for itrap_t_beg
itself. This may be more than what's available.
In your case, itrap_t_beg
is 7 ints, 28 bytes. A x86_64 watchpoint is up to eight bytes, so GDB needs four watchpoints for the entire structure - plus a fifth for itrap_t_beg
itself. The x86 family only supports four simultaneous watchpoints.
A more comprehensive example on how watchpoints work:
//set a watchpoint on '*p' before running
#include <stdio.h>
int a = 0;
int b = 0;
int c = 0;
int* p = &a;
int main()
{
puts("Hi"); // Dummy lines to make the results clearer, watchpoints stop at the line after the change
*p = 1; // Breaks: *p was changed from 0 to 1
puts("Hi");
a = 2; // Breaks: a is *p, which changed from 1 to 2
puts("Hi");
p = &b; // Breaks: p is now b, changing *p from 2 to 0
puts("Hi");
p = &c; // Doesn't break: while p changed, *p is still 0
puts("Hi");
p = NULL; // Breaks: *p is now unreadable
puts("Hi");
return 0;
}
In theory, this is a useful feature; you can watch a complex expression, breaking as soon as it's false, somewhat like a constantly-tested assertion. For example, you can watch a==b
in the above program.
In practice, it's unexpected, often triggers this issue, and usually isn't what you want.
To watch only the target address, use watch -location itrap_t_beg[1][222]
. (This is available as of GDB 7.3, released in July 2011; if you're still on 7.1, use print &itrap_t_beg[1][222]
and watch *(itrap_t)0x12345678
, or whichever address it prints.)
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With