Need suggestion on having function within a functional component in react Hooks
.
As far as I researched, many are saying it is bad practice because it creates nested/inner function every time we call re-render. After doing some analysis,
I found we can use onClick={handleClick.bind(null, props)}
on the element and place the function outside the functional component.
Example:
const HelloWorld = () => { function handleClick = (event) => { console.log(event.target.value); } return() { <> <input type="text" onChange={handleClick}/> </> } }
Please advise if there is any alternative way.
Thanks in advance.
Hooks are functions that let you “hook into” React state and lifecycle features from function components. Hooks don't work inside classes — they let you use React without classes. (We don't recommend rewriting your existing components overnight but you can start using Hooks in the new ones if you'd like.)
Hooks make React so much better because you have simpler code that implements similar functionalities faster and more effectively. You can also implement React state and lifecycle methods without writing classes.
Hooks can only be called inside the body of a function component" occurs for multiple reasons: Having a mismatch between the versions of react and react-dom . Having multiple versions of the react package in the same project. Trying to call a component as a function, e.g. App() instead of <App />
Hooks allow you to use local state and other React features without writing a class. Hooks are special functions that let you “hook onto” React state and lifecycle features inside function components. Important: React internally can't keep track of hooks that run out of order.
Don't worry about creating new functions on each render. Only in edge cases does that impede your performance. Setting onClick
handlers are not one of those, so just create a new function on each render.
However, when you need to make sure you use the same function every time, you can use useCallback
useCallback
for onClick
Here is a reason why you shouldn't bother with useCallback
for onClick
handlers (and most other event handlers).
Consider the following code snippets, one without useCallback:
function Comp(props) { return <button onClick={() => console.log("clicked", props.foo)}>Text</Button> }
and one with useCallback:
function Comp(props) { const onClick = useCallback(() => { console.log("clicked", props.foo) }, [props.foo]) return <button onClick={onClick}>Text</Button> }
The only difference in the latter is that React doen's have to change the onClick
on your button if props.foo
remains the same. Changing the callback is a very cheap operation, and it's not at all worth complicating your code for the theoretical performance improvement it gives.
Also, it's worth noting that a new function is still created on every render even when you use useCallback
, but useCallback
will return the old one as long as the dependencies passed as the second argument are unchanged.
useCallback
The point of using useCallback
is that if you compare two functions with reference equality, fn === fn2
is true only if fn
and fn2
point to the same function in memory. It doesn't matter if the functions do the same.
Thus, if you have memoisation or otherwise only run code when the function changes, it can be useful to use useCallback
to use the same function again.
As an example, React hooks compare old and new dependencies, probably using Object.is.
Another example is React.PureComponent, which will only re-render when props or state have changed. This can be useful for components that use a lot of resources to render. Passing e.g. a new onClick
to a PureComponent on each render will cause it to re-render every time.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With