Here's some code from Richard Jones' Blog:
with gui.vertical:
text = gui.label('hello!')
items = gui.selection(['one', 'two', 'three'])
with gui.button('click me!'):
def on_click():
text.value = items.value
text.foreground = red
My question is: how the heck did he do this? How can the context manager access the scope inside the with block? Here's a basic template for trying to figure this out:
from __future__ import with_statement
class button(object):
def __enter__(self):
#do some setup
pass
def __exit__(self, exc_type, exc_value, traceback):
#XXX: how can we find the testing() function?
pass
with button():
def testing():
pass
Here's one way:
from __future__ import with_statement
import inspect
class button(object):
def __enter__(self):
# keep track of all that's already defined BEFORE the `with`
f = inspect.currentframe(1)
self.mustignore = dict(f.f_locals)
def __exit__(self, exc_type, exc_value, traceback):
f = inspect.currentframe(1)
# see what's been bound anew in the body of the `with`
interesting = dict()
for n in f.f_locals:
newf = f.f_locals[n]
if n not in self.mustignore:
interesting[n] = newf
continue
anf = self.mustignore[n]
if id(newf) != id(anf):
interesting[n] = newf
if interesting:
print 'interesting new things: %s' % ', '.join(sorted(interesting))
for n, v in interesting.items():
if isinstance(v, type(lambda:None)):
print 'function %r' % n
print v()
else:
print 'nothing interesting'
def main():
for i in (1, 2):
def ignorebefore():
pass
with button():
def testing(i=i):
return i
def ignoreafter():
pass
main()
Edit: stretched code a bit more, added some explanation...:
Catching caller's locals at __exit__
is easy -- trickier is avoiding those locals that were already defined before the with
block, which is why I added to main two local functions that the with
should ignore. I'm not 100% happy with this solution, which looks a bit complicated, but I couldn't get equality testing correct with either ==
or is
, so I resorted to this rather complicated approach.
I've also added a loop (to make more strongly sure the def
s before / within / after are being properly handled) and a type-check and function-call to make sure the right incarnation of testing
is the one that's identified (everything seems to work fine) -- of course the code as written only works if the def
inside the with
is for a function callable without arguments, it's not hard to get the signature with inspect
to ward against that (but since I'm doing the call only for the purpose of checking that the right function objects are identified, I didn't bother about this last refinement;-).
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With