Hello Haskell community,
I'm new to Haskell and ran into a problem when I tried to structure my first bigger project.
Here's the minimal example of the problem (I'm using cabal to build).
This is the directory structure of a simple module:
FooMod1
|- FooMod1.cabal
|- Setup.hs
|- src
|- FooMod1.hs
|- FooMod1
|- C1.hs
|- T1.hs
The source for FooMod1.hs:
module FooMod1 (
C1(..) ,
T1(..) ,
) where
import FooMod1.C1
import FooMod1.T1
The source for C1.hs:
module FooMod1.C1 (
C1(..)
) where
class C1 a where
c1FooFun :: a -> IO ()
The source for T1.hs:
module FooMod1.T1 (
T1(..)
) where
import FooMod1.C1
data T1 = T1 deriving(Show)
instance C1 T1 where
c1FooFun T1 = putStrLn "c1FooFun from T1"
The source for the cabal file:
Name: FooMod1
Version: 0.0.1
Cabal-version: >=1.10
Build-type: Simple
library
build-depends: base >= 4 && < 5
if impl(ghc >= 7.0.0)
default-language: Haskell2010
ghc-options: -Wall
exposed-modules: FooMod1
ghc-options: -Wall -rtsopts
hs-source-dirs: src, src/FooMod1
default-language: Haskell2010
and the Setup.hs:
module Main where
import Distribution.Simple
main = defaultMain
I can do
cabal configure
cabal build
cabal install
without any problem. When I start ghci and
import FooMod1
it loads the module and I can see the data constructors. But when I try to get the type of a function for example
:t c1FooFun
or construct a value I get:
Failed to load interface for `FooMod1.C1'
There are files missing in the `FooMod1-0.0.1' package,
try running 'ghc-pkg check'.
Use -v to see a list of the files searched for.
In the expression: c1FooFun
'ghc-pkg check' reveals nothing.
What am I missing? I looked it up in the Haskell 2010 Standard (http://www.haskell.org/onlinereport/haskell2010/haskellch5.html) and i can't find the error. So my questions are
1) Why am I getting this error?
2) Is structuring a hierarchical modules like that good practice? (assume considerably larger programs)
Many thanks in advance!
Jules
5.2. hs. Loading a multi-module program is just as straightforward; just give the name of the “topmost” module to the :load command (hint: :load can be abbreviated to :l). The topmost module will normally be Main, but it doesn't have to be.
Quits GHCi. You can also quit by typing control-D at the prompt. Attempts to reload the current target set (see :load ) if any of the modules in the set, or any dependent module, has changed.
Edit: September 2016
Since I originally answered this question there is a growing practice of defining Foo.Internal
modules that are still exposed. In the original answer below I suggested using the other-modules
field. A practice that is now popular is to define Foo.Internal.*
modules that are exposed but explicitly not part of the supported API. The rational for this pattern is explained in the answers to this question.
As noted in the comments your .cabal
file is missing the other-modules
line. I think cabal install
then only installs FoodMod1
since that is all it's been told about.
This is a nice way to create internal modules with, for instance, types that are used throughout your cabal package which you don't want to expose in the package API. Since the other-modules
modules cannot be imported from outside your package it allows you to create package private functionality.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With