Export const arrow function or basic function?

Question

Which is better to do: export a const arrow function, like so:

export const foo = () => 'bar' 

or export a regular function, like so:

export function baz() {   return 'bar'; } 

They compile like so:

exports.baz = baz; function baz() {   return 'bar'; } var foo = exports.foo = function foo() {   return 'bar'; }; 

It looks like using the const/arrow function combination declares an extra variable (foo), which seems to be an unnecessary extra step over the simple function declaration.

Answer 1

The differences are minuscule. Both declare a variable.

• A const variable is constant also within your module, while a function declaration theoretically could be overwritten from inside the module
• An arrow function is a function expression, not a function declaration, and the assignment can lead to problems for circular dependencies
• An arrow function cannot be a constructor or use a dynamic this
• An arrow function is a few characters shorter if you use a concise body and a few characters longer if you use a block body.
• A function declaration better expresses intention to be callable. The arrow function stored in a const can get lost among other consts.