Drawing on the discussion on conditional dplyr evaluation I would like conditionally execute a step in pipeline depending on whether the reference column exists in the passed data frame.
The results generated by 1)
and 2)
should be identical.
# 1)
mtcars %>%
filter(am == 1) %>%
filter(cyl == 4)
# 2)
mtcars %>%
filter(am == 1) %>%
{
if("cyl" %in% names(.)) filter(cyl == 4) else .
}
# 1)
mtcars %>%
filter(am == 1)
# 2)
mtcars %>%
filter(am == 1) %>%
{
if("absent_column" %in% names(.)) filter(absent_column == 4) else .
}
For the available column the passed object does not correspond to the initial data frame. The original code returns the error message:
Error in
filter(cyl == 4)
: object'cyl'
not found
I have tried alternative syntax (with no luck):
>> mtcars %>%
... filter(am == 1) %>%
... {
... if("cyl" %in% names(.)) filter(.$cyl == 4) else .
... }
Show Traceback
Rerun with Debug
Error in UseMethod("filter_") :
no applicable method for 'filter_' applied to an object of class "logical"
I wanted to expand this question that would account for the evaluation on the right-hand side of the ==
in filter
call. For instance the syntax below attempts to filter on the first available value.
mtcars %>%
filter({
if ("does_not_ex" %in% names(.))
does_not_ex
else
NULL
} == {
if ("does_not_ex" %in% names(.))
unique(.[['does_not_ex']])
else
NULL
})
Expectedly, the call evaluates to an error message:
Error in
filter_impl(.data, quo)
: Result must have length 32, not 0
When applied to existing column:
mtcars %>%
filter({
if ("mpg" %in% names(.))
mpg
else
NULL
} == {
if ("mpg" %in% names(.))
unique(.[['mpg']])
else
NULL
})
It works with a warning message:
mpg cyl disp hp drat wt qsec vs am gear carb
1 21 6 160 110 3.9 2.62 16.46 0 1 4 4
Warning message: In
{
: longer object length is not a multiple of shorter object length
Is there a neat way of expending the existing syntax in order to get conditional evaluation on the right-hand side of the filter
call, ideally staying within dplyr workflow?
Because of the way the scopes here work, you cannot access the dataframe from within your if
statement. Fortunately, you don't need to.
Try:
mtcars %>%
filter(am == 1) %>%
filter({if("cyl" %in% names(.)) cyl else NULL} == 4)
Here you can use the '.
' object within the conditional so you can check if the column exists and, if it exists, you can return the column to the filter
function.
EDIT: as per docendo discimus' comment on the question, you can access the dataframe but not implicitly - i.e. you have to specifically reference it with .
With across()
in dplyr > 1.0.0 you can now use any_of
when filtering. Compare original with all columns:
mtcars %>%
filter(am == 1) %>%
filter(cyl == 4)
With cyl
removed, it throws an error:
mtcars %>%
select(!cyl) %>%
filter(am == 1) %>%
filter(cyl == 4)
Using any_of
(note you have to write "cyl"
and not cyl
):
mtcars %>%
select(!cyl) %>%
filter(am == 1) %>%
filter(across(any_of("cyl"), ~.x == 4))
#N.B. this is equivalent to just filtering by `am == 1`.
I know I'm late to the party, but here's an answer somewhat more in line with what you were originally thinking:
mtcars %>%
filter(am == 1) %>%
{
if("cyl" %in% names(.)) filter(., cyl == 4) else .
}
Basically, you were missing the .
in filter
. Note this is because the pipeline doesn't add .
to filter(expr)
since it is in an expression surrounded by {}
.
On a busy day, one might do like the following:
library(dplyr)
df <- data.frame(A = 1:3, B = letters[1:3], stringsAsFactors = F)
> df %>% mutate( C = ifelse("D" %in% colnames(.), D, B))
# Notice the values on "C" colum. No error thrown, but the logic and result is wrong
A B C
1 1 a a
2 2 b a
3 3 c a
Why? Because "D" %in% colnames(.)
returns only one value of TRUE
or FALSE
, and therefore ifelse
operates only once. Then the value is broadcasted to the whole column!
> df %>% mutate( C = if("D" %in% colnames(.)) D else B)
A B C
1 1 a a
2 2 b b
3 3 c c
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With