I have following code for specifying parameters for SQL query. I am getting following exception when I use Code 1
; but works fine when I use Code 2
. In Code 2
we have a check for null and hence a if..else
block.
Exception:
The parameterized query '(@application_ex_id nvarchar(4000))SELECT E.application_ex_id A' expects the parameter '@application_ex_id', which was not supplied.
Code 1:
command.Parameters.AddWithValue("@application_ex_id", logSearch.LogID);
Code 2:
if (logSearch.LogID != null) { command.Parameters.AddWithValue("@application_ex_id", logSearch.LogID); } else { command.Parameters.AddWithValue("@application_ex_id", DBNull.Value ); }
QUESTION
Can you please explain why it is unable to take NULL from logSearch.LogID value in Code 1 (but able to accept DBNull)?
Is there a better code to handle this?
Reference:
CODE
public Collection<Log> GetLogs(LogSearch logSearch) { Collection<Log> logs = new Collection<Log>(); using (SqlConnection connection = new SqlConnection(connectionString)) { connection.Open(); string commandText = @"SELECT * FROM Application_Ex E WHERE (E.application_ex_id = @application_ex_id OR @application_ex_id IS NULL)"; using (SqlCommand command = new SqlCommand(commandText, connection)) { command.CommandType = System.Data.CommandType.Text; //Parameter value setting //command.Parameters.AddWithValue("@application_ex_id", logSearch.LogID); if (logSearch.LogID != null) { command.Parameters.AddWithValue("@application_ex_id", logSearch.LogID); } else { command.Parameters.AddWithValue("@application_ex_id", DBNull.Value ); } using (SqlDataReader reader = command.ExecuteReader()) { if (reader.HasRows) { Collection<Object> entityList = new Collection<Object>(); entityList.Add(new Log()); ArrayList records = EntityDataMappingHelper.SelectRecords(entityList, reader); for (int i = 0; i < records.Count; i++) { Log log = new Log(); Dictionary<string, object> currentRecord = (Dictionary<string, object>)records[i]; EntityDataMappingHelper.FillEntityFromRecord(log, currentRecord); logs.Add(log); } } //reader.Close(); } } } return logs; }
AddWithValue replaces the SqlParameterCollection. Add method that takes a String and an Object. The overload of Add that takes a string and an object was deprecated because of possible ambiguity with the SqlParameterCollection.
The DBNull class represents a nonexistent value. In a database, for example, a column in a row of a table might not contain any data whatsoever. That is, the column is considered to not exist at all instead of merely not having a value. A DBNull object represents the nonexistent column.
Annoying, isn't it.
You can use:
command.Parameters.AddWithValue("@application_ex_id", ((object)logSearch.LogID) ?? DBNull.Value);
Or alternatively, use a tool like "dapper", which will do all that messing for you.
For example:
var data = conn.Query<SomeType>(commandText, new { application_ex_id = logSearch.LogID }).ToList();
I'm tempted to add a method to dapper to get the IDataReader
... not really sure yet whether it is a good idea.
I find it easier to just write an extension method for the SqlParameterCollection
that handles null values:
public static SqlParameter AddWithNullableValue( this SqlParameterCollection collection, string parameterName, object value) { if(value == null) return collection.AddWithValue(parameterName, DBNull.Value); else return collection.AddWithValue(parameterName, value); }
Then you just call it like:
sqlCommand.Parameters.AddWithNullableValue(key, value);
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With