I am putting together a proof of concept to help identify gotchas using Spring Boot/Netflix OSS and Kubernetes together. This is also to prove out related technologies such as Prometheus and Graphana.
I have a Eureka service setup which is starting with no trouble within my Kubernetes cluster. This is named discovery and has been given the name "discovery-1551420162-iyz2c" when added to K8 using
For my config server, I am trying to use Eureka based on a logical URL so in my bootstrap.yml I have
server: port: 8889 eureka: instance: hostname: configserver client: registerWithEureka: true fetchRegistry: true serviceUrl: defaultZone: http://discovery:8761/eureka/ spring: cloud: config: server: git: uri: https://github.com/xyz/microservice-config
and I am starting this using
kubectl run configserver --image=xyz/config-microservice --replicas=1 --port=8889
This service ends up running named as configserver-3481062421-tmv4d. I then see exceptions in the config server logs as it tries to locate the eureka instance and cannot.
I have the same setup for this using docker-compose locally with links and it starts the various containers with no trouble.
discovery: image: xyz/discovery-microservice ports: - "8761:8761" configserver: image: xyz/config-microservice ports: - "8888:8888" links: - discovery
How can I setup something like eureka.client.serviceUri so my microservices can locate their peers without knowing fixed IP addresses within the K8 cluster?
You have to have a Kubernetes service on top of the eureka pods/deployments which then will provide you a referable IP address and port number. And then use that referable address to look up the Eureka service, instead of "8761".
The eureka server application must be deployed in a very stable network environment, and kubernetes statefulset helps us in ensuring stable network, in your kubernetes file, have a section for the service, and another for the statefulset.
An abstract way to expose an application running on a set of Pods as a network service. With Kubernetes you don't need to modify your application to use an unfamiliar service discovery mechanism. Kubernetes gives Pods their own IP addresses and a single DNS name for a set of Pods, and can load-balance across them.
Spring Cloud Kubernetes is a Kubernetes API server integration that allows for service discovery, configuration, and load balancing used by Spring Cloud; it provides Spring Cloud implementations of common interfaces that consume Kubernetes.
How can I setup something like eureka.client.serviceUri?
You have to have a Kubernetes service on top of the eureka pods/deployments which then will provide you a referable IP address and port number. And then use that referable address to look up the Eureka service, instead of "8761".
You shouldn't have more than one pod/replica of Eureka per k8s service (remember, pods are ephemeral, you need a referable IP address/domain name for eureka service registry). To achieve high availability (HA), spin up more k8s services with one pod in each.
So, now you have referable IP/Domain name (IP of the k8s service) for each of your Eureka.. now it can register each other.
Feeling like it's an overkill? If all your services are in same kubernetes namespace you can achieve everything (well, almost everything, except client side load balancing) that eureka offers though k8s service + KubeDNS add-On. Read this article by Christian Posta
Instead of Services with one pod each, you can make use of StatefulSets as Stefan Ocke pointed out.
Like a Deployment, a StatefulSet manages Pods that are based on an identical container spec. Unlike a Deployment, a StatefulSet maintains a sticky identity for each of their Pods. These pods are created from the same spec, but are not interchangeable: each has a persistent identifier that it maintains across any rescheduling.
Regarding HA configuration of Eureka in Kubernetes: You can (meanwhile) use a StatefulSet for this instead of creating a service for each instance. The StatefulSet guarantees stable network identity for each instance you create. For example, the deployment could look like the following yaml (StatefulSet + headless Service). There are two Eureka instances here, according to the DNS naming rules for StatefulSets (assuming namespace is "default"):
eureka-0.eureka.default.svc.cluster.local and
eureka-1.eureka.default.svc.cluster.local
As long as your pods are in the same namespace, they can reach Eureka also as:
Note: The docker image used in the example is from https://github.com/stefanocke/eureka. You might want to chose or build your own one.
--- apiVersion: v1 kind: Service metadata: name: eureka labels: app: eureka spec: ports: - port: 8761 name: eureka clusterIP: None selector: app: eureka --- apiVersion: apps/v1beta2 kind: StatefulSet metadata: name: eureka spec: serviceName: "eureka" replicas: 2 selector: matchLabels: app: eureka template: metadata: labels: app: eureka spec: containers: - name: eureka image: stoc/eureka ports: - containerPort: 8761 env: - name: MY_POD_NAME valueFrom: fieldRef: fieldPath: metadata.name # Due to camelcase issues with "defaultZone" and "preferIpAddress", _JAVA_OPTIONS is used here - name: _JAVA_OPTIONS value: -Deureka.instance.preferIpAddress=false -Deureka.client.serviceUrl.defaultZone=http://eureka-0.eureka:8761/eureka/,http://eureka-1.eureka:8761/eureka/ - name: EUREKA_CLIENT_REGISTERWITHEUREKA value: "true" - name: EUREKA_CLIENT_FETCHREGISTRY value: "true" # The hostnames must match with the the eureka serviceUrls, otherwise the replicas are reported as unavailable in the eureka dashboard - name: EUREKA_INSTANCE_HOSTNAME value: ${MY_POD_NAME}.eureka # No need to start the pods in order. We just need the stable network identity podManagementPolicy: "Parallel"
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With