Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Erlang binary to lower case performance

My goal is to speed up performance of ASCII-only binary converting to lower case. I do not need any languages other than English. I've wrote and compare some variants:

Binary comprehension:

binary_comprehension(Binary) ->
    << <<if
             C >= $A andalso C =< $Z -> C - $A + $a;
             true -> C
         end >>
       || <<C>> <= Binary >>.

List comprehension:

list_comprehension(Binary) ->
    L = binary_to_list(Binary),
    Lower =
        [if
             C >= $A andalso C =< $Z -> C - $A + $a;
             true -> C
         end || C <- L],
    list_to_binary(Lower).

And regular string:lowercase.

And surprisingly list comprehension beat all others:

1> timer:tc(fun() -> lists:foreach(fun(_) -> tolower:list_comprehension(<<"QWEQWEIQEKQHWKEHKQWHEKQHWKEQWEKHQWLKL">>) end, L100000) end).
{267603,ok}

2> timer:tc(fun() -> lists:foreach(fun(_) -> tolower:binary_comprehension(<<"QWEQWEIQEKQHWKEHKQWHEKQHWKEQWEKHQWLKL">>) end, L100000) end).
{324383,ok}

3> timer:tc(fun() -> lists:foreach(fun(_) -> string:lowercase(<<"QWEQWEIQEKQHWKEHKQWHEKQHWKEQWEKHQWLKL">>) end, L100000) end).
{319819,ok}

Any ideas why double list conversion + comprehension is much faster than just binary transformation?

Maybe you know more powerful optimisation?

Update:

I also found that list-of-char version of string is also fast:

string_lowercase(Binary) ->
    L = binary_to_list(Binary),
    Lower = string:lowercase(L),
    list_to_binary(Lower).

Run:

39> timer:tc(fun() -> lists:foreach(fun(_) -> tolower:string_to_lower(<<"QWEQWEIQEKQHWKEHKQWHEKQHWKEQWEKHQWLKL">>) end, L100000) end).
{277766,ok}
like image 802
Dmitry Poroh Avatar asked Feb 17 '19 14:02

Dmitry Poroh


1 Answers

I made some modification of the code and changed test case. Test changes is not mandatory but I personally like more this way:

-module(tolower).
-compile(export_all).

u2l(C) when C >= $A andalso C =< $Z -> C + 32;
u2l(C) -> C.

binary_comprehension(Binary) ->
  << << (u2l(C)) >> || <<C>> <= Binary >>.

list_comprehension(Binary) ->
  list_to_binary([u2l(C) || C <- binary_to_list(Binary)]).

list_recur(Binary) -> list_recur(binary_to_list(Binary), []).

list_recur([], Result) -> lists:reverse(Result);
list_recur([C | Tail], Result) when C >= $A andalso C =< $Z ->
  list_recur(Tail, [(C + 32) | Result]);
list_recur([C | Tail], Result) ->
  list_recur(Tail, [C | Result]).

string_to_lower(Binary) ->
  list_to_binary(string:lowercase(binary_to_list(Binary))).

test() ->
  L100000 = lists:seq(1, 100000),
  TL0 = <<"QWEQWEIQEKQHWKEHKQWHEKQHWKEQWEKHQWLKL">>,
  TL = binary:copy(TL0, 100000),
  {R0, _} = timer:tc(fun() -> lists:foreach(fun(_) -> tolower:binary_comprehension(TL0) end, L100000) end),
  {R1, _} = timer:tc(tolower, binary_comprehension, [TL]),
  {R2, _} = timer:tc(tolower, list_comprehension, [TL]),
  {R3, _} = timer:tc(tolower, list_recur, [TL]),
  {R4, _} = timer:tc(string, lowercase, [TL]),
  {R5, _} = timer:tc(tolower, string_to_lower, [TL]),
  io:format("~n1.binary_comprehension = ~10w~n2.binary_comprehension = ~10w~n3.  list_comprehension = ~10w~n4.          list_recur = ~10w~n5.           lowercase = ~10w~n6.     string_to_lower = ~10w~n", 
  [R0,R1,R2,R3,R4,R5]).

Erlang shell shows that elapsed time not consistent due to concurrent nature of system. But the best time is for binary_comprehension as expected.

62> c(tolower).    
tolower.erl:2: Warning: export_all flag enabled - all functions will be exported
{ok,tolower}
63> l(tolower).    
{module,tolower}
64> tolower:test().

1.binary_comprehension =     109000
2.binary_comprehension =      94000
3.  list_comprehension =     312001
4.          list_recur =     344001
5.           lowercase =     469002
6.     string_to_lower =     218000
ok
65> tolower:test().

1.binary_comprehension =     140998
2.binary_comprehension =      93999
3.  list_comprehension =     327994
4.          list_recur =     296996
5.           lowercase =     155997
6.     string_to_lower =     280996
ok
66> tolower:test().

1.binary_comprehension =     124998
2.binary_comprehension =      93998
3.  list_comprehension =     327995
4.          list_recur =     296995
5.           lowercase =     452993
6.     string_to_lower =     202997
ok
67> tolower:test().

1.binary_comprehension =     125000
2.binary_comprehension =      94000
3.  list_comprehension =     312000
4.          list_recur =     282000
5.           lowercase =     171000
6.     string_to_lower =     266000
ok

Time on line 5 is different of time on line 6 because when you invoke string:lowercase/1 with binary argument it processed as utf8 sequence. When you invoke string:lowercase/1 with string argument utf8 processing is avoided. See code of string.erl from OTP for details.

like image 82
Alexei K Avatar answered Nov 07 '22 19:11

Alexei K