I'm using yield return to iterate over an SqlDataReader's records:
IEnumerable<Reading> GetReadings() {
    using (var connection = new SqlConnection(_connectionString))
    {
        using (var command = new SqlCommand(_query, connection))
        {
            connection.Open();
            using (var reader = command.ExecuteReader())
            {
                while (reader.Read())
                {
                    yield return new Reading
                    {
                        End = reader.GetDateTime(0),
                        Value = reader.GetDouble(1)
                    };
                }
            }
            connection.Close();
        }
    }
}
I'm then using an adapted version of this accepted answer to "zip" many iterators together:
   var enumerators = data.Select(d => new
   {
       d.Key,
       Enumerator = d.Value.GetEnumerator()
   }).ToList();
   while (true)
   {
       foreach (var item in enumerators)
       {
           if (!item.Enumerator.MoveNext())
           {
               yield break;
           }
           /*snip*/
       }
      /*snip*/
   }
In the method above, the enumerator's Dispose() is not explicitly called, and because they are not used within a using or foreach statement, would the underlying iterator remain in an open state?  In my case with an open SqlConnection.
Should I be calling Dispose() on the enumerators to make sure the whole downstream chain is closed?
When enumerating over this iterator, if the enumerator's
Dispose()is not explicitly called, and not used within ausingstatement, would the underlying iterator remain in an open state?
Let me re-phrase that question into a form that is easier to answer.
When using
foreachto enumerate via an iterator block that contains ausingstatement, are the resources disposed of when control leaves the loop?
Yes.
What mechanisms ensure this?
These three:
A using statement is just a convenient way to write a try-finally where the finally disposes of the resource.
The foreach loop is also a convenient syntax for try-finally, and again, the finally calls Dispose on the enumerator when control leaves the loop.
The enumerator produced by an iterator block implements IDisposable. Calling Dispose() on it ensures that all the finally blocks in the iterator block are executed, including finally blocks that come from using statements.
If I avoid the
foreachloop, callGetEnumeratormyself, and don't callDisposeon the enumerator, do I have a guarantee that thefinallyblocks of the enumerator will run?
Nope.  Always dispose your enumerators. They implement IDisposable for a reason.
Is that now clear?
If this subject interests you then you should read my long series on design characteristics of iterator blocks in C#.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ericlippert/archive/tags/iterators/
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With