I would like to store a mapping of string -> string in a Typescript object, and enforce that all of the keys map to strings. For example:
var stuff = {};
stuff["a"] = "foo"; // okay
stuff["b"] = "bar"; // okay
stuff["c"] = false; // ERROR! bool != string
Is there a way for me to enforce that the values must be strings (or whatever type..)?
Use the keyof typeof syntax to create a type from an object's keys, e.g. type Keys = keyof typeof person . The keyof typeof syntax returns a type that represents all of the object's keys as strings. index.ts.
The indexing type is itself a type, so we can use unions, keyof , or other types entirely: type I1 = Person ["age" | "name"]; type I1 = string | number. type I2 = Person [keyof Person ]; type I2 = string | number | boolean.
To define an object of objects type in TypeScript, we can use index signatures with the type set to the type for the value object. const data: { [name: string]: DataModel } = { //... }; to create a data variable of type { [name: string]: DataModel } where DataModel is an object type.
To dynamically access an object's property: Use keyof typeof obj as the type of the dynamic key, e.g. type ObjectKey = keyof typeof obj; . Use bracket notation to access the object's property, e.g. obj[myVar] .
var stuff: { [key: string]: string; } = {};
stuff['a'] = ''; // ok
stuff['a'] = 4; // error
// ... or, if you're using this a lot and don't want to type so much ...
interface StringMap { [key: string]: string; }
var stuff2: StringMap = { };
// same as above
interface AgeMap {
[name: string]: number
}
const friendsAges: AgeMap = {
"Sandy": 34,
"Joe": 28,
"Sarah": 30,
"Michelle": "fifty", // ERROR! Type 'string' is not assignable to type 'number'.
};
Here, the interface AgeMap
enforces keys as strings, and values as numbers. The keyword name
can be any identifier and should be used to suggest the syntax of your interface/type.
You can use a similar syntax to enforce that an object has a key for every entry in a union type:
type DayOfTheWeek = "sunday" | "monday" | "tuesday" | "wednesday" | "thursday" | "friday" | "saturday";
type ChoresMap = { [day in DayOfTheWeek]: string };
const chores: ChoresMap = { // ERROR! Property 'saturday' is missing in type '...'
"sunday": "do the dishes",
"monday": "walk the dog",
"tuesday": "water the plants",
"wednesday": "take out the trash",
"thursday": "clean your room",
"friday": "mow the lawn",
};
You can, of course, make this a generic type as well!
type DayOfTheWeek = "sunday" | "monday" | "tuesday" | "wednesday" | "thursday" | "friday" | "saturday";
type DayOfTheWeekMap<T> = { [day in DayOfTheWeek]: T };
const chores: DayOfTheWeekMap<string> = {
"sunday": "do the dishes",
"monday": "walk the dog",
"tuesday": "water the plants",
"wednesday": "take out the trash",
"thursday": "clean your room",
"friday": "mow the lawn",
"saturday": "relax",
};
const workDays: DayOfTheWeekMap<boolean> = {
"sunday": false,
"monday": true,
"tuesday": true,
"wednesday": true,
"thursday": true,
"friday": true,
"saturday": false,
};
10.10.2018 update:
Check out @dracstaxi's answer below - there's now a built-in type Record
which does most of this for you.
1.2.2020 update: I've entirely removed the pre-made mapping interfaces from my answer. @dracstaxi's answer makes them totally irrelevant. If you'd still like to use them, check the edit history.
A quick update: since Typescript 2.1 there is a built in type Record<T, K>
that acts like a dictionary.
In this case you could declare stuff like so:
var stuff: Record<string, any> = {};
You could also limit/specify potential keys by unioning literal types:
var stuff: Record<'a'|'b'|'c', string|boolean> = {};
Here's a more generic example using the record type from the docs:
// For every properties K of type T, transform it to U
function mapObject<K extends string, T, U>(obj: Record<K, T>, f: (x: T) => U): Record<K, U>
const names = { foo: "hello", bar: "world", baz: "bye" };
const lengths = mapObject(names, s => s.length); // { foo: number, bar: number, baz: number }
TypeScript 2.1 Documentation on Record<T, K>
The only disadvantage I see to using this over {[key: T]: K}
is that you can encode useful info on what sort of key you are using in place of "key" e.g. if your object only had prime keys you could hint at that like so: {[prime: number]: yourType}
.
Here's a regex I wrote to help with these conversions. This will only convert cases where the label is "key". To convert other labels simply change the first capturing group:
Find: \{\s*\[(key)\s*(+\s*:\s*(\w+)\s*\]\s*:\s*([^\}]+?)\s*;?\s*\}
Replace: Record<$2, $3>
You can pass a name to the unknown key and then write your types:
type StuffBody = {
[key: string]: string;
};
Now you can use it in your type checking:
let stuff: StuffBody = {};
But for FlowType there is no need to have name:
type StuffBody = {
[string]: string,
};
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With