TLDR: See the last paragraph.
I have an operator&
defined for several template classes like so:
template <typename T>
struct Class {
Class(T const &t) { }
};
template <typename T_Lhs, typename T_Rhs>
struct ClassAnd {
ClassAnd(T_Lhs const &lhs, T_Rhs const &rhs) { }
};
template <typename T, typename T_Rhs>
ClassAnd<Class<T>, T_Rhs> operator&(Class<T> const &lhs, T_Rhs const &rhs) {
return ClassAnd<Class<T>, T_Rhs>(lhs, rhs);
}
template <typename T0, typename T1, typename T_Rhs>
ClassAnd<ClassAnd<T0, T1>, T_Rhs> operator&(ClassAnd<T0, T1> const &lhs, T_Rhs const &rhs) {
return ClassAnd<ClassAnd<T0, T1>, T_Rhs>(lhs, rhs);
}
int main() {
Class<int> a(42);
Class<double> b(3.14);
auto c = a & b;
}
This works just fine.
The problem occurs when I want to add a not operation, which is allowed on only one side or the other of an and operation, and must return an instance of ClassAndNot
rather than ClassAnd
:
template <typename T>
struct ClassNot {
ClassNot(T const &t) : value(t) { }
T value;
};
template <typename T_Lhs, typename T_Rhs>
struct ClassAndNot {
ClassAndNot(T_Lhs const &lhs, T_Rhs const &rhs) { }
};
template <typename T_Lhs, typename T_Rhs>
ClassAndNot<T_Lhs, T_Rhs> operator&(T_Lhs const &lhs, ClassNot<T_Rhs> const &rhs) {
return ClassAndNot<T_Lhs, T_Rhs>(lhs, rhs.value);
}
template <typename T_Rhs>
ClassNot<T> operator!(T_Rhs const &rhs) {
return ClassNot<T_Rhs>(rhs);
}
...
auto c = a & !b;
This results in an ambiguity between the operator&
taking an arbitrary right hand side to return a ClassAnd
, and the operator&
taking a ClassNot
right hand side to return a ClassAndNot
.
Question:
How could std::enable_if
be used here to disable the first operator&
if its right hand side is of any of the types ClassNot
? Is there something like std::is_same
that returns true if one side is a template instance of the other?
p.s. You can find a full working example on ideone.
You should be able to construct your own trait for this:
template <class T>
struct IsClassNot : std::false_type
{};
template <class T>
struct IsClassNot<ClassNot<T>> : std::true_type
{};
template <typename T, typename T_Rhs>
typename std::enable_if<!IsClassNot<T_Rhs>::value,
ClassAnd<Class<T>, T_Rhs>>::type operator&(Class<T> const &lhs, T_Rhs const &rhs) {
return ClassAnd<Class<T>, T_Rhs>(lhs, rhs);
}
Live example
Of course, you can go crazy with generalisations and create an all-purpose trait:
template <class T, template <class...> class TT>
struct is_instantiation_of : std::false_type
{};
template <template <class... > class TT, class... A>
struct is_instantiation_of<TT<A...>, TT> : std::true_type
{};
template <class T>
using IsClassNot = is_instantiation_of<T, ClassNot>;
Live example
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With