Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

EF (entity framework) usage of "using" statement

I have a project on MVC. We chose EF for our DB transactions. We created some managers for the BLL layer. I found a lot of examples, where "using" statement is used, i.e.

public Item GetItem(long itemId)     {         using (var db = new MyEntities())         {             return db.Items.Where(it => it.ItemId == itemId && !it.IsDeleted).FirstOrDefault();         }     } 

Here we create a new instance of DBcontext MyEntities(). We using "using" in order to "ensure the correct use of IDisposable objects."

It's only one method in my manager. But I have more than ten of them. Every time I call any method from the manager I'll be using "using" statement and create another DBcontext in the memory. When will the garbage collector (GC) dispose them? Does anyone know?

But there is alternative usage of the manager methods. We create a global variable:

private readonly MyEntities db = new MyEntities(); 

and use DBcontext in every method without "using" statement. And method looks like this:

public Item GetItem(long itemId) {     return db.Items.Where(it => it.ItemId == itemId && !it.IsDeleted).FirstOrDefault(); } 

Questions:

  1. What is the proper way of using DBcontext variable?
  2. What if we wouldn't use "usage" statement (because it affects the performance) - GC will do all for that?

I'm a "rookie" in EF usage and still haven't found the unequivocal answer for this question.

like image 588
Pal Avatar asked Jul 30 '13 10:07

Pal


People also ask

Should I use using in DbContext?

EF and EF Core DbContext types implement IDisposable . As such, best practice programming suggests that you should wrap them in a using() block (or new C# 8 using statement). Unfortunately, doing this, at least in web apps, is generally a bad idea.

What is the use of using statement in C#?

The using statement causes the object itself to go out of scope as soon as Dispose is called. Within the using block, the object is read-only and can't be modified or reassigned. A variable declared with a using declaration is read-only.

Does using statement Call dispose?

The using statement guarantees that the object is disposed in the event an exception is thrown. It's the equivalent of calling dispose in a finally block.

Should DbContext be Singleton?

First, DbContext is a lightweight object; it is designed to be used once per business transaction. Making your DbContext a Singleton and reusing it throughout the application can cause other problems, like concurrency and memory leak issues. And the DbContext class is not thread safe.


1 Answers

I think you will find many suggesting this style of pattern. Not just me or Henk DBContext handling

  • Yes, Ideally Using statements for DBContext subtypes
  • Even better Unit Of Work patterns that are managed with Using, that have a context and dispose the context Just 1 of many UoW examples, this one from Tom Dykstra
  • The Unit Of Work Manager should be New each Http request
  • The context is NOT thread safe so make sure each thread has its own context.
  • Let EF cache things behind the scenes.
  • Test Context creation times. after several Http request. Do you still have a concern?
  • Expect problems if you store the context in static. any sort of concurrent access will hurt and if you are using parallel AJAX calls, assume 90+% chance of problems if using a static single context.

For some performance tips, well worth a read

like image 80
phil soady Avatar answered Sep 26 '22 01:09

phil soady