I have multiple linq queries that retrieve the same data just at different grouping levels. (potentially 3 different levels). The linq query currently results in an enumerable list of a custom object. The items I don't understand or wonder if possible (to reduce redundant code):
can I make the following group by clause to be dynamic? if so, can it dynamically populate my custom object group data when it is grouped at that level.
For instance:
var myReport_GroupProductLevel =
from r in mySum_GroupProductLevel
join pc in _myPlotCount on r.Strata equals pc.Strata
join acr in _myStrataAcres on pc.Strata equals acr.Strata
group new { r, pc, acr } by new { r.Strata, pc.Count, acr.Acres, r.GroupName, r.ProductName } into g
select new DataSummary
{
Strata = g.Key.Strata,
PlotCount = g.Key.Count,
Acres = g.Key.Acres,
ClassName = string.Empty,
GroupName = g.Key.GroupName,
ProductName = g.Key.ProductName,
TPAMEAN = g.Sum(x => x.r.TPA / x.pc.Count),
TPADEV = g.Select(x => x.r.TPA).StdDev(g.Key.Count)
};
If I wanted to group only by "GroupName" instead... I would rewrite the query. Issues I see are, if I'm grouping by a value then I need that value in the query (g.Key.GroupName); but since I'm creating a new custom object the other non-grouped values such as "ClassName" require a value (I used string.Empty above, but that is static).
Thanks for any insight...
if anyone was curious, I got it to work by using a conditional statement... since grouping by empty will make it collapse.
var mySum_ClassGroupProductLevel =
from s in ReportData.myStands
join p in ReportData.myPlots on s.ID equals p.StandID
join t in ReportData.myTrees on p.ID equals t.PlotID
group t by new { s.Strata, p.ID,
ClassName = useClassName ? t.ClassName : string.Empty,
GroupName = useGroupName ? t.GroupName : string.Empty,
ProductName = useProductName ? t.ProductName : string.Empty }
into g
select new
{}
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With