Here is my function:
let rec applyAll rules expr =
rules
|> List.fold (fun state rule ->
match state with
| Some e ->
match applyRule rule e with
| Some newE -> Some newE
| None -> Some e
| None -> applyRule rule expr) None
|> Option.bind (applyAll rules)
It takes a set of rules and applies them until the input expression is reduced as far as possible. I could rewrite the Option.bind
to be a match
expression and it would clearly take advantage of tail call optimization. However, this is more elegant to me, so I would like to keep it as is unless it will be consuming stack unnecessarily. Does F# do TCO with this code?
EDIT: This code always returns None; I'll be fixing that, but I think the question still makes sense.
I pasted your code into a file tco.fs. I added an applyRule function to make it compilable.
tco.fs
let applyRule rule exp =
Some ""
let rec applyAll rules expr =
rules
|> List.fold (fun state rule ->
match state with
| Some e ->
match applyRule rule e with
| Some newE -> Some newE
| None -> Some e
| None -> applyRule rule expr) None
|> Option.bind (applyAll rules)
Then I made a batch file to analyze the IL.
compile_and_dasm.bat
SET ILDASM="C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v10.0A\bin\NETFX 4.6 Tools\ildasm.exe"
Fsc tco.fs
%ILDASM% /out=tco.il /NOBAR /tok tco.exe
As an output we find the tco.il containing the IL. The relevant function is here.
.method /*06000002*/ public static class [FSharp.Core/*23000002*/]Microsoft.FSharp.Core.FSharpOption`1/*01000003*/<!!b>
applyAll<a,b>(class [FSharp.Core/*23000002*/]Microsoft.FSharp.Collections.FSharpList`1/*01000008*/<!!a> rules,
string expr) cil managed
{
.custom /*0C000003:0A000003*/ instance void [FSharp.Core/*23000002*/]Microsoft.FSharp.Core.CompilationArgumentCountsAttribute/*01000007*/::.ctor(int32[]) /* 0A000003 */ = ( 01 00 02 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 )
// Code size 26 (0x1a)
.maxstack 8
IL_0000: ldarg.0
IL_0001: newobj instance void class Tco/*02000002*//applyAll@13/*02000003*/<!!b,!!a>/*1B000004*/::.ctor(class [FSharp.Core/*23000002*/]Microsoft.FSharp.Collections.FSharpList`1/*01000008*/<!1>) /* 0A000004 */
IL_0006: newobj instance void class Tco/*02000002*//'applyAll@6-1'/*02000004*/<!!a>/*1B000005*/::.ctor() /* 0A000005 */
IL_000b: ldnull
IL_000c: ldarg.0
IL_000d: call !!1 [FSharp.Core/*23000002*/]Microsoft.FSharp.Collections.ListModule/*01000009*/::Fold<!!0,class [FSharp.Core/*23000002*/]Microsoft.FSharp.Core.FSharpOption`1/*01000003*/<string>>(class [FSharp.Core/*23000002*/]Microsoft.FSharp.Core.FSharpFunc`2/*01000002*/<!!1,class [FSharp.Core/*23000002*/]Microsoft.FSharp.Core.FSharpFunc`2/*01000002*/<!!0,!!1>>,
!!1,
class [FSharp.Core/*23000002*/]Microsoft.FSharp.Collections.FSharpList`1/*01000008*/<!!0>) /* 2B000001 */
IL_0012: tail.
IL_0014: call class [FSharp.Core/*23000002*/]Microsoft.FSharp.Core.FSharpOption`1/*01000003*/<!!1> [FSharp.Core/*23000002*/]Microsoft.FSharp.Core.OptionModule/*0100000A*/::Bind<string,!!1>(class [FSharp.Core/*23000002*/]Microsoft.FSharp.Core.FSharpFunc`2/*01000002*/<!!0,class [FSharp.Core/*23000002*/]Microsoft.FSharp.Core.FSharpOption`1/*01000003*/<!!1>>,
class [FSharp.Core/*23000002*/]Microsoft.FSharp.Core.FSharpOption`1/*01000003*/<!!0>) /* 2B000002 */
IL_0019: ret
} // end of method Tco::applyAll
We see here that the tail opcode is generated. This is a hint from the IL compiler to the JIT compiler (which actually generates the executable machine code), that a tail call should be possible here.
Whether the tail call is actually executed as such is up to the JIT compiler, as can be read here.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With