I was wondering when most people wrote their unit tests, if at all. I usually write tests after writing my initial code to make sure it works like its supposed to. I then fix what is broken.
I have been pretty successful with this method but have been wondering if maybe switching to writing the test first would be advantageous?
It often makes sense to write the test first and then write as much code as needed to allow the test to pass. Doing this moves towards a practice known as Test-Driven Development (TDD). Bluefruit uses a lot of TDD because it helps us to build the right product without waste and redundancies.
For Test-Driven Development (TDD), you write unit tests before writing any implementation. This makes your implementation details in your code shorter and easier to understand. In this instance, the best time to write unit tests is immediately. For others, most developers write unit tests after the code's been written.
Arguably you must write all of the unit tests for a feature first in order to fully define the interface of the feature. In practice many features only have 1 test (at least to start)...
Unit Testing of the software product is carried out during the development of an application. An individual component may be either an individual function or a procedure. Unit Testing is typically performed by the developer. In SDLC or V Model, Unit testing is the first level of testing done before integration testing.
whenever possible i try to follow a pure TDD approach:
it is easy to get excited and start coding the feature first, but this often means that you will not think through all of the public interfaces in advance.
EDIT: note that if you write the code first, it is easy to unintentionally write the test to conform to the code, instead of the other way 'round!
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With