It is understood that Python lambda functions help in creating anonymous functions. These can be used in other functions like map(), reduce(), filter() and key() in sorting functions. It can also be used to demonstrate and utilise lexical closures.
What I would like to specifically know here is, do lambda functions have a specific advantage over regular functions in terms of their execution times, considering all the other factors to be unchanged?
As I am new to Python, I have tried to understand them by analogously comparing them with the inline functions of C++. Inline functions, as I understand from C++, are useful in saving time as they do not require the necessary "housekeeping tasks" concerned with context switching that occur during function calls and jumps.
Do Python Lambda functions provide with such similar advantages over regular functions?
Some relevant posts that I found useful but not necessarily helpful for my question: Why are Python lambdas useful? Why use lambda functions?
Lambda functions are inline functions and thus execute comparatively faster.
If we need to reduce the Lambda execution time, we can try increasing memory (and by extension, CPU) to process it faster. However, when we try to increase the memory for a function past a certain limit, it won't improve the execution time as AWS currently offers a maximum of 2 cores CPU.
Lambda functions allow you to create small, single-use functions that can save time and space in your code. They ares also useful when you need to call a function that expects a function as an argument for a callback such as Map() and Filter() .
You cannot increase the runtime to more than 15 minutes. The AWS Lambda limit page states the Function timeout is 900 seconds (15 minutes) . If you need more than 15 minutes of execution time you have to look at other services. You could have a look if AWS Batch would suit your needs.
No. The function objects generated by lambda
behave exactly like those generated by def
. They do not execute any faster. (Also, inline
in modern C++ is no longer a directive telling the compiler to inline a function, and has very little to do with inlining.)
If you want, you can take a look at the bytecode disassembly for a lambda
and an equivalent def
:
import dis dis.dis(lambda x: x + 2) print() def f(x): return x + 2 dis.dis(f)
Output:
3 0 LOAD_FAST 0 (x) 3 LOAD_CONST 1 (2) 6 BINARY_ADD 7 RETURN_VALUE 6 0 LOAD_FAST 0 (x) 3 LOAD_CONST 1 (2) 6 BINARY_ADD 7 RETURN_VALUE
No difference. You can also time them:
import timeit def f(x): return x + 2 g = lambda x: x + 2 print(timeit.timeit('f(3)', globals=globals())) print(timeit.timeit('g(3)', globals=globals()))
Output:
0.06977041810750961 0.07760106027126312
The lambda actually took longer in this run. (There seems to be some confusion in the comments about whether we're timing enough work to be meaningful. timeit
wraps the timed statement in a million-iteration loop by default, so yes, we are.)
Before you ask, no, lambda
has no performance disadvantage over def
either. The winner of the above race is basically up to luck. lambda
and def
do have a significant disadvantage over avoiding the use of a callback function entirely, though. For example, map
-with-lambda
has a significant performance penalty relative to list comprehensions:
import timeit print(timeit.timeit('list(map(lambda x: x*x, range(10)))')) print(timeit.timeit('[x*x for x in range(10)]'))
Output:
1.5655903220176697 0.7803761437535286
Whether lambda
or def
, Python functions are expensive to call.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With