Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

dificulty solving a code in O(logn)

I wrote a function that gets as an input a list of unique ints in order,(from small to big). Im supposed to find in the list an index that matches the value in the index. for example if L[2]==2 the output is true. so after i did that in complexity O(logn) i now want to find how many indexes behave like that in the given list with the same complexity O(logn). im uploading my first code that does the first part and the second code which i need help with:

def steady_state(L):

    lower= 0
    upper= len(L) -1
    while lower<=upper:
        middle_i= (upper+ lower)//2
        if L[middle_i]== middle_i:
            return middle_i
        elif L[middle_i]>middle_i:
            upper= middle_i-1
        else:
            lower= middle_i +1
    return None


def cnt_steady_states(L):
    lower= 0
    upper= len(L) -1
    a=b=steady_state(L)
    if steady_state(L)== None:
        return 0
    else:
        cnt=1
        while True:

            if L[upper] == upper and a<=upper:
                cnt+= upper-a
                upper= a
            if L[lower]== lower and b>=lower:
                cnt+= b- lower
                lower = b
like image 558
user2751595 Avatar asked Nov 22 '13 15:11

user2751595


1 Answers

It's not possible with the restrictions you've given yet. The best complexity you can theoretically achieve is On).

O() assumes the worst case (just a definition, you could drop that part). And in the worst case you will always have to look at each item in order to check it for being equal to its index.

The case changes if you have more restrictions (e. g. the numbers are all ints and none may appear more than once, i. e. no two consecutive numbers are equal). Maybe this is the case?

EDIT:

After hearing that in fact my assumed restrictions apply (i. e. only once-appearing ints) I now propose this approach: You can safely assume that you can have only exactly one continuous range where all your matching entries are located. I. e. you only need to find a lower bound and upper bound. The wanted result will then be the size of that range.

Each bound can safely be found using a binary search, of which each has O(log n).

def binsearch(field, lower=True, a=0, b=None):
  if b is None:
    b = len(field)
  while a + 1 < b:
    c = (a + b) / 2
    if lower:
      if field[c] < c:
        a = c
      else:
        b = c
    else:  # search for upper bound
      if field[c] > c:
        b = c
      else:
        a = c
  return b if lower else a

def indexMatchCount(field):
  upper = binsearch(field, lower=False)
  lower = binsearch(field, b=upper+1)
  return upper - lower + 1

This I used for testing:

field = list({ random.randint(-10, 30) for i in range(30) })
field.sort()
upper = binsearch(field, lower=False)
lower = binsearch(field, b=upper+1)
for i, f in enumerate(field):
  print lower <= i <= upper, i == f, i, f
like image 131
Alfe Avatar answered Sep 28 '22 02:09

Alfe