If I create an alias in the select
clause then I cannot use it in the where
clause because according to the order of execution of sql queries where
comes before select
.
But I can create an alias in the select
clause and use it in a having
clause though having
comes before select
.
Why is it so?
Ex:
select type, (case when number>25 then 1 else 0 end) inc
from animals
where inc='1';
this wont work. But,
select type, (case when number>25 then 1 else 0 end) inc
from animals
having inc='1';
This works. Why so?
Basically because they where defined for different purposes. The WHERE
clause is for records filtering and the HAVING
clause is designed for filtering with aggregate functions (GROUP BY
).
In your second query an implicit GROUP BY
filtering is being used, so for instance, if you add another column to the SELECT
clause you will end up with different results.
EDIT based on correction by Martin Smith
HAVING
was created to allow filtering of rows resulting of a GROUP BY
. When no GROUP BY
is specified, the whole result is considered a group.
If neither a
<where clause>
nor a<group by clause>
is specified, then let T be the result of the preceding<from clause>
or
...the group is the entire table if no
<group by clause>
is specified
EDIT 2 Now regarding the ALIAS:
The specification for the WHERE clause regarding the columns references in the search condition says this:
Each
<column reference>
directly contained in the<search condition>
shall unambiguously reference a column of T or be an outer reference.
Refer to: 7.6 <where clause>
, Syntax Rule 1.
The specification for the HAVING clause regarding the columns references in the search condition says this:
Each
<column reference>
directly contained in the<search condition>
shall unambiguously reference a grouping column of T or be an outer reference.
Refer to: 7.8 <having clause>
, Syntax Rule 1.
And a grouping column is defined as:
A column referenced in a
<group by clause>
is a grouping column.
So in conclusion the WHERE
must reference a column of the table and the HAVING
clause must reference a grouping column of the group of rows.
(Second Informal Review Draft) ISO/IEC 9075:1992, Database Language SQL- July 30, 1992
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With