Difference between try-finally and try-catch

Question

What's the difference between

try {     fooBar(); } finally {     barFoo(); } 

and

try {   fooBar(); } catch(Throwable throwable) {     barFoo(throwable); // Does something with throwable, logs it, or handles it. } 

I like the second version better because it gives me access to the Throwable. Is there any logical difference or a preferred convention between the two variations?

Also, is there a way to access the exception from the finally clause?

Answer 1

These are two different things:

• The catch block is only executed if an exception is thrown in the try block.
• The finally block is executed always after the try(-catch) block, if an exception is thrown or not.

In your example you haven't shown the third possible construct:

try {     // try to execute this statements... } catch( SpecificException e ) {     // if a specific exception was thrown, handle it here } // ... more catches for specific exceptions can come here catch( Exception e ) {     // if a more general exception was thrown, handle it here } finally {     // here you can clean things up afterwards } 

And, like @codeca says in his comment, there is no way to access the exception inside the finally block, because the finally block is executed even if there is no exception.

Of course you could declare a variable that holds the exception outside of your block and assign a value inside the catch block. Afterwards you can access this variable inside your finally block.

Throwable throwable = null; try {     // do some stuff } catch( Throwable e ) {     throwable = e; } finally {     if( throwable != null ) {         // handle it     } } 

Answer 2

These are not variations, they're fundamentally different things. finally is executed always, catch only when an exception occurs.