What is the difference, if any, between the <description>
tag and the <content:encoded>
tag in RSS 2.0 format specifications?
Is one more important than the other?
Should I be using both in my feeds or one will suffice?
The <description>
tag is for the summary of the post, but in plain text only. No markup.
You can get around that if you escape the tags or wrap the content in:
<![CDATA[ post body goes <strong>here</strong> ]]>
But you're not really supposed to be doing that.
If you want markup, you're supposed to use <content:encoded>
and use the <![CDATA[
and ]]>
wrappers here.
The
content:encoded
element can be used in conjunction with thedescription
element to provide an item's full content along with a shorter summary. Under this approach, the complete text of the item is presented incontent:encoded
and the summary indescription
.
###RSS Best Practices Profile: content:encoded
In short, <description>
is for the summary and the rest of the post is in <content:encoded>
.
Since some readers may not support the tags as expected, you usually see the entire post in <description>
and not a mix of the two.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With