I have
var H: array of THandle;
then in a loop I create multiple threads, and assign thread handles to the elements of H, and then wait on them. Passing @H[0] as the 2nd parameter to WFMO below works.
WaitForMultipleObjects(Length(H), @H[0], True, INFINITE) <-- Works
But passing @H as below Fails with WAIT_FAILED. GetLastError returns "Invalid Handle".
WaitForMultipleObjects(Length(H), @H, True, INFINITE) <--- Fails.
Why is @H different from @H[0] ?
H0 is called the null hypothesis and HA is called the alternative hypothesis. The union of null and alternative hypothesis defines a hypothesis H ∈ Θ=Θ0 ∪ ΘA called the maintained hypothesis. A hypothesis is called simple if it completely specify the probability distribution and otherwise com- posite.
limh→0|h|h lim h → 0 | h | h. doesn't exist. However, this is the limit that gives us the derivative that we're after. If the limit doesn't exist then the derivative doesn't exist either. In this example we have finally seen a function for which the derivative doesn't exist at a point.
A null hypothesis is a statement, in which there is no relationship between two variables. An alternative hypothesis is statement in which there is some statistical significance between two measured phenomenon.
Alternative Hypothesis: H1: The hypothesis that we are interested in proving. Null hypothesis: H0: The complement of the alternative hypothesis. Type I error: reject the null hypothesis when it is correct. It is measured by the level of significance α, i.e., the probability of type I error.
H
is already a pointer and it points to the first element, so@H[0]
is the same as H
- pointer to the first element@H
is equals to @@H[0]
- pointer to pointer to the first element.If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With