During my reading about Asynchronous Programming in .Net 4.5 async
and await
keywords
I read Here the following paragraph
Processing Asynchronous Requests
In web applications that sees a large number of concurrent requests at start-up or has a bursty load (where concurrency increases suddenly), making these web service calls asynchronous will increase the responsiveness of your application. An asynchronous request takes the same amount of time to process as a synchronous request. For example, if a request makes a web service call that requires two seconds to complete, the request takes two seconds whether it is performed synchronously or asynchronously. However, during an asynchronous call, a thread is not blocked from responding to other requests while it waits for the first request to complete. Therefore, asynchronous requests prevent request queuing and thread pool growth when there are many concurrent requests that invoke long-running operations.
for the bold words, I couldn't understand them how An asynchronous request takes the same amount of time to process as a synchronous request?
For example:
public async Task MyMethod()
{
Task<int> longRunningTask = LongRunningOperation();
//indeed you can do independent to the int result work here
//and now we call await on the task
int result = await longRunningTask;
//use the result
Console.WriteLine(result);
}
public async Task<int> LongRunningOperation() // assume we return an int from this long running operation
{
await Task.Delay(1000); //1 seconds delay
return 1;
}
What I understand that LongRunningOperation()
starts execution from the first line calling here Task<int> longRunningTask = LongRunningOperation();
and returns value once calling await
,
so from my point of view asynchronous code faster than synchronous, is that right?
What I understand that the main thread working on executing MyMethod()
not blocked waiting for LongRunningOperation()
to be accomplished but it returns to thread pool to serve another request. so is there another thread assigned to LongRunningOperation();
to execute it?
If yes so what is the difference between Asynchronous Programming and Multithreading Programming ?
Update:
let's say that code becomes like that:
public async Task MyMethod()
{
Task<int> longRunningTask = LongRunningOperation();
//indeed you can do independent to the int result work here
DoIndependentWork();
//and now we call await on the task
int result = await longRunningTask;
//use the result
Console.WriteLine(result);
}
public async Task<int> LongRunningOperation() // assume we return an int from this long running operation
{
DoSomeWorkNeedsExecution();
await Task.Delay(1000); //1 seconds delay
return 1;
}
In this case , will LongRunningOperation()
be executed by another thread during DoIndependentWork()
execution?
The differences between asynchronous and synchronous include: Async is multi-thread, which means operations or programs can run in parallel. Sync is single-thread, so only one operation or program will run at a time. Async is non-blocking, which means it will send multiple requests to a server.
The key difference between synchronous and asynchronous communication is synchronous communications are scheduled, real-time interactions by phone, video, or in-person. Asynchronous communication happens on your own time and doesn't need scheduling.
An asynchronous request takes the same amount of time to process as a synchronous request. For example, if a request makes a web service call that requires two seconds to complete, the request takes two seconds whether it is performed synchronously or asynchronously.
C# supports both synchronous and asynchronous methods. Let's learn the difference between synchronous and asynchronous and how to code in C#. Interestingly enough, any method we normally create in C# is synchronous by default.
The asynchronous operations aren't faster. If you wait for 10 seconds asynchronously (i.e. await Task.Delay(10000)
) or synchronously (i.e. Thread.Sleep(10000)
) it would take the same 10 seconds. The only difference would be that the first would not hold up a thread while waiting but the second will.
Now, if you fire up a task and don't wait for it to complete immediately you can use the same thread to do some other work, but it doesn't "speed up" the asynchronous operation's run:
var task = Task.Delay(10000);
// processing
await task; // will complete only after 10 seconds
About your second question: Task.Delay
(like other truly asynchronous operations) doesn't need a thread to be executed and so there is no thread. Task.Delay
is implemented using a System.Threading.Timer
that you fire up and it raises an event when it's done, in the meantime it doesn't need a thread because there's no code to execute.
So when the thread that was running MyMethod
reaches the await longRunningTask
it is freed (as long as longRunningTask
hasn't completed yet). If it was a ThreadPool
thread it will return to the ThreadPool
where it can process some other code in your application.
Regarding the update the flow would be so:
MyMethod
starts processingLongRunningOperation
starts processingDoSomeWorkNeedsExecution
is executed on the calling threadawait
is reached in LongRunningOperation
and so a hot task is returned.DoIndependentWork
is executed by the same calling thread (LongRunningOperation
is still "running", no thread is needed)await
is reached in MyMethod
. If the original task completed the same thread will proceed on synchronously, if not then a hot task would be returned that would complete eventually.So the fact that you're using async-await
allows you to use a thread that would otherwise be blocked waiting synchronously to executed CPU-intensive work.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With