So I was going through the Math.java
source code and I found that there is a holder class created to hold the randomNumberGenerator
static variable. Here is the relevant piece of code.
public final class Math {
// other methods.
public static double random() {
return RandomNumberGeneratorHolder.randomNumberGenerator.nextDouble();
}
private static final class RandomNumberGeneratorHolder {
static final Random randomNumberGenerator = new Random();
}
}
IMO, We could have simply declared the randomNumberGenerator
as private static final
inside the Math
class itself.
My question is, Is there any advantage of creating a separate holder class for this? Or it is just a personal preference.
This is an example of the initialisation-on-demand holder pattern. When the Math
class is loaded by the JVM, the Random
instance will not be constructed immediately. Instead that will only happen when the random()
method is called, at which point the RandomNumberGenreatorHolder
class will be loaded, and the Random
singleton object constructed.
Essentially the code is ensuring that the Random
singleton is created lazily.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With