The following code generates an exception (c0000005 ACCESS_VIOLATION) in Delphi 10.3.1 only when compiled to 64-bit.
However, the same code does not generate an exception in Delphi 10.3.1 when compiled to 32 bits. Also, it does not fail in Delphi 10.2.3 when compiled to either 32 bits or 64 bits.
program CrashOn64;
{$APPTYPE CONSOLE}
{$R *.res}
uses
System.SysUtils;
type
TMyBaseClass = class
protected
procedure Setup(aParams: array of const); virtual;
public
end;
type
TMyWorkClass = class(TMyBaseClass)
protected
procedure DoSetup; virtual;
public
procedure Setup(aParams: array of const); override;
end;
{ TMyBaseClass }
procedure TMyBaseClass.Setup(aParams: array of const);
begin
end;
{ TMyWorkClass }
procedure TMyWorkClass.DoSetup;
begin
inherited;
end;
procedure TMyWorkClass.Setup(aParams: array of const);
begin
inherited;
DoSetup
end;
// main
var
myClass: TMyWorkClass;
begin
try
myClass:=TMyWorkClass.Create;
try
myClass.Setup([123]); // <-- Crash on Windows 64-bit
writeln('OK!')
finally
myClass.Free
end
except
on E: Exception do Writeln(E.ClassName, ': ', E.Message);
end;
readln; // Wait for Enter key
end.
The issue seems to be in the argument type being array of const
. The code still fails for 64 bits if we change array of const
to array of integer
, so it seems that the new Delphi compiler has an issue with arrays with an unknown number of parameters. We found the trick to avoid the compiler bug by creating a type for array of integer
but this trick is not available for what we need array of const
.
This is the assembler code generated for 64 bits in Delphi 10.3.1 accoding to the CPU View:
CrashOn64.dpr.41: inherited;
0000000000428888 488B7528 mov rsi,[rbp+$28]
000000000042888C 488D7D20 lea rdi,[rbp+$20]
0000000000428890 48B9FFFFFFFFFFFFFF1F mov rcx,$1fffffffffffffff <<< What????????
000000000042889A F348A5 rep movsq <<< Crashes here.
000000000042889D A5 movsd
000000000042889E 66A5 movsw
00000000004288A0 A4 movsb
00000000004288A1 488B4D50 mov rcx,[rbp+$50]
00000000004288A5 488D5520 lea rdx,[rbp+$20]
00000000004288A9 448B4560 mov r8d,[rbp+$60]
00000000004288AD E8CEFEFFFF call TMyBaseClass.Setup
And this is the code generated for 64 bits in Delphi 10.2.3 for the same function:
CrashOn64.dpr.41: inherited;
0000000000427329 488B4D50 mov rcx,[rbp+$50]
000000000042732D 488B5528 mov rdx,[rbp+$28]
0000000000427331 448B4560 mov r8d,[rbp+$60]
0000000000427335 E8E6FEFFFF call TMyBaseClass.Setup
Is this a 64-bit compiler bug in Delphi 10.3.1 or are we missing anything? Are there any workarounds?
This bug is FAR more extensive, it doesn't handle VARed shortstrings to procedures/functions.
consider this SIMPLE code...
procedure Copyit(var s: shortstring); // VAR is important, pass by value ok
begin
debugform(s); // break point here
end;
procedure TForm1.Button1Click(Sender: TObject);
var
stuff: shortstring;
begin
stuff:= 'This is a demo string';
CopyIt(stuff);
end;
In 32 bit mode, it generates code you would expect. In 64 bit mode, it generates code exactly as shown above, A huge memory move with rcx set to $1FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF !!!
This is bug and should be reported1. As mentioned in the question, it fails for every type of open array.
A workaround is to define the array as a const
in the method:
procedure Setup(const aParams: array of const);
Declaring the open array as const
, passes the array by reference, while without the const, it will be passed by value as a copy. In this case, the Rio version fails.
1 It was reported as: Access violation when calling an inherited function with an open array parameter in Rio
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With