Is this a bug in data.table::fread
(version 1.9.2) or misplaced user expectation/error?
Consider this trivial example where I have a table of values, TAB
separated with possibly missing values. If the values are missing in the first column, fread
gets upset, but if missing values are elsewhere I return the data.table
I expect:
# Data with missing value in first column, third row and last column, second row:
12 876 19
23 39
15 20
fread("12 876 19
23 39
15 20")
#Error in fread("12\t876\t19\n23\t39\t\n\t15\t20") :
# Not positioned correctly after testing format of header row. ch=' '
# Data with missing values last column, rows two and three:
"12 876 19
23 39
15 20 "
fread( "12 876 19
23 39
15 20 " )
# V1 V2 V3
#1: 12 876 19
#2: 23 39 NA
#3: 15 20 NA
# Returns as expected.
Is this a bug or is it not possible to have missing values in the first column (or do I have malformed data somehow?).
I believe this is the same bug that I reported here.
The most recent version that I know will work with this type of input is Rev. 1180. You could checkout and build that version by adding @1180
to the end of the svn checkout
command.
svn checkout svn://svn.r-forge.r-project.org/svnroot/datatable/@1180
If you're not familiar with checking out and building packages, see here
But, a lot of great features, bug fixes, enhancements have been implemented since Rev. 1180. (The deveolpment version at the time of this writing is Rev. 1272). So, a better solution, is to replace the R/fread.R
and src/fread.c
files with the versions from Rev. 1180 or older, and then re-building the package.
You can find those files online without checking them out here (sorry, I can't figure out how to post links that include '*', so you have to copy/paste):
fread.R:http://r-forge.r-project.org/scm/viewvc.php/*checkout*/pkg/R/fread.R?revision=988&root=datatable
fread.c:http://r-forge.r-project.org/scm/viewvc.php/*checkout*/pkg/src/fread.c?revision=1159&root=datatable
Once you've rebuilt the package, you'll be able to read your tsv file.
> fread("12\t876\t19\n23\t39\t\n\t15\t20")
V1 V2 V3
1: 12 876 19
2: 23 39 NA
3: NA 15 20
The downside to doing this is that the old version of fread()
does not pass a newer test -- you won't be able to read fields that have quotes in the middle.
> fread('A,B,C\n1.2,Foo"Bar,"a"b\"c"d"\nfo"o,bar,"b,az""\n')
Error in fread("A,B,C\n1.2,Foo\"Bar,\"a\"b\"c\"d\"\nfo\"o,bar,\"b,az\"\"\n") :
Not positioned correctly after testing format of header row. ch=','
With newer versions of fread
, you would get this
> fread('A,B,C\n1.2,Foo"Bar,"a"b\"c"d"\nfo"o,bar,"b,az""\n')
A B C
1: 1.2 Foo"Bar a"b"c"d
2: fo"o bar b,az"
So, for now, which version "works" depends on whether you're more likely to have missing values in the first column, or quotes in fields. For me, it's the former, so I'm still using the old code.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With