With the recent versions of dagger 2 one of the improvements made are the possibility of having static provide methods. Simply so:
@Provides
static A providesA() {
return A();
}
I was wondering how does one go about doing this in kotlin? I've tried
@Module
class AModule {
companion object {
@JvmStatic
@Provides
fun providesA(): A = A()
}
}
But I get the error message:
@Provides methods can only be present within a @Module or @ProducerModule
I'm guessing there's something going on here with the companion object, however I'm quite new to Kotlin and I'm unsure of how one can do this. Is it even possible?
Thanks!
Although I think zsmb13's solution is better, I found another solution which works
@Module
class AModule {
@Module
companion object {
@JvmStatic
@Provides
fun providesA(): A = A()
}
// add other non-static provides here
}
However, note that there will be two generated classes: AModule_ProvidesAFactory
and AModule_Companion_ProvidesAFactory
rather than the one AModule_ProvidesAFactory
class for the case with an object instead of a class with a companion object
I can't test it right now, but I think this should work:
@Module
object AModule {
@JvmStatic
@Provides
fun providesA(): A = A()
}
Now Dagger2 (version 2.26) support companion objects
in @Module
annotated classes in kotlin withthouh @Module and @JvmStatic annotations
Better support for binding declarations within Kotlin companion objects of @Module annotated classes.
Update dagger dependencies to 2.26 version as
def dagger_version = "2.26"
//dagger
implementation "com.google.dagger:dagger:$dagger_version"
kapt "com.google.dagger:dagger-compiler:$dagger_version"
//If you're using classes in dagger.android you'll also want to include:
implementation "com.google.dagger:dagger-android:$dagger_version"
implementation "com.google.dagger:dagger-android-support:$dagger_version"
kapt "com.google.dagger:dagger-android-processor:$dagger_version"
so now you can use
@Module
class AModule {
companion object {
@Provides
fun providesA(): A = A()
}
}
Important: Soon, adding @Module
on companion objects
in @Module
classes will raise an error.
Note: For backwards compatibility, we still allow @Module on the companion object and @JvmStatic on the provides methods. However, @Module on the companion object is now a no-op and all of its attributes (e.g. "includes") will be ignored.
In future releases, we
will make it an error to use @Module on a companion object.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With