Monitoring my .NET app in Performance Monitor I can see the .NET CLR LocksAndThreads / # of current logical Threads is increasing steadily (currently 293) over time which indicates the thread stack is leaking.
I can find many articles which tell me this is the problem but nothing that tells me how to find the cause - so where do I start? Can Windbg tell me where the problem lies?
This is my performance monitor over 3hrs telling my current logical threads is 150:
And this is the output of the threads window, which doesn't tell me much because I can't access their call stacks - they are mostly marked as [unavailable] or [In a sleep, wait or join] | [External Code]:
Unflagged 141024 124 Worker Thread <No Name> Normal
Unflagged > 0 0 Unknown Thread [Thread Destroyed]
Unflagged 136272 2 Worker Thread <No Name> Highest
Unflagged 133060 7 Worker Thread vshost.RunParkingWindow [Managed to Native Transition] Normal
Unflagged 136952 10 Main Thread Main Thread [edited].Program.Main Normal
Unflagged 134544 9 Worker Thread .NET SystemEvents [Managed to Native Transition] Normal
Unflagged 136556 11 Worker Thread Worker Thread [edited].MessageService.ProcessJobs.AnonymousMethod__0 Normal
Unflagged 141364 113 Worker Thread <No Name> [In a sleep, wait, or join] Normal
Unflagged 140896 0 Worker Thread [Thread Destroyed] Normal
Unflagged 136776 19 Worker Thread <No Name> [In a sleep, wait, or join] Normal
Unflagged 135704 20 Worker Thread <No Name> [In a sleep, wait, or join] Normal
Unflagged 136712 21 Worker Thread <No Name> [In a sleep, wait, or join] Normal
Unflagged 134984 22 Worker Thread <No Name> [In a sleep, wait, or join] Normal
Unflagged 134660 23 Worker Thread Worker Thread [edited].BroadcastService.ProcessJobs.AnonymousMethod__1d Normal
Unflagged 140224 152 Worker Thread <No Name> Normal
Unflagged 140792 157 Worker Thread <No Name> Normal
Unflagged 137116 0 Worker Thread <No Name> Normal
Unflagged 140776 111 Worker Thread <No Name> Normal
Unflagged 140784 0 Worker Thread [Thread Destroyed] Normal
Unflagged 140068 145 Worker Thread <No Name> Normal
Unflagged 139000 150 Worker Thread <No Name> Normal
Unflagged 140828 52 Worker Thread <No Name> Normal
Unflagged 137752 146 Worker Thread <No Name> Normal
Unflagged 140868 151 Worker Thread <No Name> Normal
Unflagged 141324 139 Worker Thread <No Name> Normal
Unflagged 140168 154 Worker Thread <No Name> Normal
Unflagged 141848 0 Worker Thread [Thread Destroyed] Normal
Unflagged 135544 153 Worker Thread <No Name> Normal
Unflagged 142260 140 Worker Thread <No Name> Normal
Unflagged 141528 142 Worker Thread <No Name> [In a sleep, wait, or join] Normal
Unflagged 141344 0 Worker Thread [Thread Destroyed] Normal
Unflagged 140096 136 Worker Thread <No Name> Normal
Unflagged 141712 134 Worker Thread <No Name> Normal
Unflagged 141688 147 Worker Thread <No Name> Normal
Update: I've since tracked the culprit down to a System.Timers.Timer. Even when this timer called an empty method on each Elapsed event it still raised the logical thread count indefinitely. Just changing the timer to a DispatcherTimer has fixed the problem.
I started looking into all the timers in my application after seeing a large number when running !dumpheap -type TimerCallback
in Windbg as mentioned in this question.
I'd still like to know how I could've detected this via Windbg debugging rather than the disable timers/check performance/repeat method that lead me to the fix. I.e. anything that could've told me which timer was creating the problem.
This is typically caused by having thread-pool threads getting stuck and not completing. Every half a second, the threadpool manager allows another thread to start to try to work down the backlog. This keeps going until it reaches the maximum number of threads as set by ThreadPool.SetMaxThreads(). By default a huge number, 1000 on a 4-core machine.
Use Debug + Windows + Threads to look at the running threads. Their call stack should make it obvious why they are blocking.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With