I want to build a hash code queue using variadic template. The minimal example code is
template<typename T>
void hash_queue(queue<size_t>& q){
  q.push( typeid(T).hash_code() );
}
template<typename T, typename... Ts>
void hash_queue(queue<size_t>& q){
  hash_queue<Ts...>(q);
  q.push( typeid(T).hash_code() );
}
int main(){
  queue<size_t> q;
  hash_queue<int, float, double>(q);
  return 0;
}
On compile I get
main.cpp: In instantiation of ‘void hash_queue(std::queue<long unsigned int>&) [with T = float; Ts = {double}]’:
main.cpp:19:22:   required from ‘void hash_queue(std::queue<long unsigned int>&) [with T = int; Ts = {float, double}]’
main.cpp:25:35:   required from here
main.cpp:19:22: error: call of overloaded ‘hash_queue(std::queue<long unsigned int>&)’ is ambiguous
   hash_queue<Ts...>(q);
                      ^
main.cpp:19:22: note: candidates are:
main.cpp:13:6: note: void hash_queue(std::queue<long unsigned int>&) [with T = double]
 void hash_queue(queue<size_t>& q){
      ^
main.cpp:18:6: note: void hash_queue(std::queue<long unsigned int>&) [with T = double; Ts = {}]
 void hash_queue(queue<size_t>& q){
How could I resolve this? I don't want to create instances of the types. These types will be object classes with constructor classes
Disambiguate using a second template argument:
template<typename T>
void hash_queue(queue<size_t>& q){
  q.push( typeid(T).hash_code() );
}
template<typename T, typename U, typename... Ts>
void hash_queue(queue<size_t>& q){
  hash_queue<U, Ts...>(q);
  hash_queue<T>(q);
}
                        It's also possible to not use recursion  at all, and instead pack expand into a std::initializer_list and then push into the queue with a loop.
template<typename... Ts>
void hash_queue(queue<size_t>& q){
  std::initializer_list<size_t> hash_codes = {typeid(Ts).hash_code()...};
  for(auto h : hash_codes)
    q.push( h );
}
Or even shorter:
template<typename... Ts>
void hash_queue(queue<size_t>& q){
  for(auto h : {typeid(Ts).hash_code()...})
    q.push( h );
}
The longer version works even when the pack is empty. The shorter one doesn't because range-for uses auto internally, which can't deduce the type from an empty initializer list.
Note that this pushes into the queue in reverse order compared to your example code. (Give <int, float, double>, it pushes int first and double last; your code pushes double first and int last.)
If that's undesired, using the longer form (optionally replacing std::initializer_list<size_t> with auto) and loop manually:
template<typename... Ts>
void hash_queue(queue<size_t>& q){
  std::initializer_list<size_t> hash_codes = {typeid(Ts).hash_code()...};
  for(auto p = hash_codes.end(), end = hash_codes.begin(); p != end; --p)
      q.push( *(p-1) );
}
or in C++14
template<typename... Ts>
void hash_queue(queue<size_t>& q){
  std::initializer_list<size_t> hash_codes = {typeid(Ts).hash_code()...};
  for(auto p = rbegin(hash_codes), end = rend(hash_codes); p != end; ++p)
      q.push( *p );
}
                        You can use std::enable_if like following :
template<typename T, typename... Ts>
void hash_queue( queue<size_t>& q, 
                 typename std::enable_if<sizeof...(Ts)!=0 >::type* = 0 ){
  hash_queue<Ts...>(q);
  q.push( typeid(T).hash_code() );
}
See demo
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With