Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Create code first, many to many, with additional fields in association table

I have this scenario:

public class Member {     public int MemberID { get; set; }      public string FirstName { get; set; }     public string LastName { get; set; }      public virtual ICollection<Comment> Comments { get; set; } }  public class Comment {     public int CommentID { get; set; }     public string Message { get; set; }      public virtual ICollection<Member> Members { get; set; } }  public class MemberComment {     public int MemberID { get; set; }     public int CommentID { get; set; }     public int Something { get; set; }     public string SomethingElse { get; set; } } 

How do I configure my association with fluent API? Or is there a better way to create the association table?

like image 778
hgdean Avatar asked Aug 13 '11 12:08

hgdean


People also ask

What is many-to-many relationships in code first approach?

A many-to-many relationship is defined in code by the inclusion of collection properties in each of the entities - The Categories property in the Book class, and the Books property in the Category class: public class Book. { public int BookId { get; set; }


1 Answers

It's not possible to create a many-to-many relationship with a customized join table. In a many-to-many relationship EF manages the join table internally and hidden. It's a table without an Entity class in your model. To work with such a join table with additional properties you will have to create actually two one-to-many relationships. It could look like this:

public class Member {     public int MemberID { get; set; }      public string FirstName { get; set; }     public string LastName { get; set; }      public virtual ICollection<MemberComment> MemberComments { get; set; } }  public class Comment {     public int CommentID { get; set; }     public string Message { get; set; }      public virtual ICollection<MemberComment> MemberComments { get; set; } }  public class MemberComment {     [Key, Column(Order = 0)]     public int MemberID { get; set; }     [Key, Column(Order = 1)]     public int CommentID { get; set; }      public virtual Member Member { get; set; }     public virtual Comment Comment { get; set; }      public int Something { get; set; }     public string SomethingElse { get; set; } } 

If you now want to find all comments of members with LastName = "Smith" for example you can write a query like this:

var commentsOfMembers = context.Members     .Where(m => m.LastName == "Smith")     .SelectMany(m => m.MemberComments.Select(mc => mc.Comment))     .ToList(); 

... or ...

var commentsOfMembers = context.MemberComments     .Where(mc => mc.Member.LastName == "Smith")     .Select(mc => mc.Comment)     .ToList(); 

Or to create a list of members with name "Smith" (we assume there is more than one) along with their comments you can use a projection:

var membersWithComments = context.Members     .Where(m => m.LastName == "Smith")     .Select(m => new     {         Member = m,         Comments = m.MemberComments.Select(mc => mc.Comment)     })     .ToList(); 

If you want to find all comments of a member with MemberId = 1:

var commentsOfMember = context.MemberComments     .Where(mc => mc.MemberId == 1)     .Select(mc => mc.Comment)     .ToList(); 

Now you can also filter by the properties in your join table (which would not be possible in a many-to-many relationship), for example: Filter all comments of member 1 which have a 99 in property Something:

var filteredCommentsOfMember = context.MemberComments     .Where(mc => mc.MemberId == 1 && mc.Something == 99)     .Select(mc => mc.Comment)     .ToList(); 

Because of lazy loading things might become easier. If you have a loaded Member you should be able to get the comments without an explicit query:

var commentsOfMember = member.MemberComments.Select(mc => mc.Comment); 

I guess that lazy loading will fetch the comments automatically behind the scenes.

Edit

Just for fun a few examples more how to add entities and relationships and how to delete them in this model:

1) Create one member and two comments of this member:

var member1 = new Member { FirstName = "Pete" }; var comment1 = new Comment { Message = "Good morning!" }; var comment2 = new Comment { Message = "Good evening!" }; var memberComment1 = new MemberComment { Member = member1, Comment = comment1,                                          Something = 101 }; var memberComment2 = new MemberComment { Member = member1, Comment = comment2,                                          Something = 102 };  context.MemberComments.Add(memberComment1); // will also add member1 and comment1 context.MemberComments.Add(memberComment2); // will also add comment2  context.SaveChanges(); 

2) Add a third comment of member1:

var member1 = context.Members.Where(m => m.FirstName == "Pete")     .SingleOrDefault(); if (member1 != null) {     var comment3 = new Comment { Message = "Good night!" };     var memberComment3 = new MemberComment { Member = member1,                                              Comment = comment3,                                              Something = 103 };      context.MemberComments.Add(memberComment3); // will also add comment3     context.SaveChanges(); } 

3) Create new member and relate it to the existing comment2:

var comment2 = context.Comments.Where(c => c.Message == "Good evening!")     .SingleOrDefault(); if (comment2 != null) {     var member2 = new Member { FirstName = "Paul" };     var memberComment4 = new MemberComment { Member = member2,                                              Comment = comment2,                                              Something = 201 };      context.MemberComments.Add(memberComment4);     context.SaveChanges(); } 

4) Create relationship between existing member2 and comment3:

var member2 = context.Members.Where(m => m.FirstName == "Paul")     .SingleOrDefault(); var comment3 = context.Comments.Where(c => c.Message == "Good night!")     .SingleOrDefault(); if (member2 != null && comment3 != null) {     var memberComment5 = new MemberComment { Member = member2,                                              Comment = comment3,                                              Something = 202 };      context.MemberComments.Add(memberComment5);     context.SaveChanges(); } 

5) Delete this relationship again:

var memberComment5 = context.MemberComments     .Where(mc => mc.Member.FirstName == "Paul"         && mc.Comment.Message == "Good night!")     .SingleOrDefault(); if (memberComment5 != null) {     context.MemberComments.Remove(memberComment5);     context.SaveChanges(); } 

6) Delete member1 and all its relationships to the comments:

var member1 = context.Members.Where(m => m.FirstName == "Pete")     .SingleOrDefault(); if (member1 != null) {     context.Members.Remove(member1);     context.SaveChanges(); } 

This deletes the relationships in MemberComments too because the one-to-many relationships between Member and MemberComments and between Comment and MemberComments are setup with cascading delete by convention. And this is the case because MemberId and CommentId in MemberComment are detected as foreign key properties for the Member and Comment navigation properties and since the FK properties are of type non-nullable int the relationship is required which finally causes the cascading-delete-setup. Makes sense in this model, I think.

like image 69
Slauma Avatar answered Oct 08 '22 17:10

Slauma