To create a new Integer object that holds the value in java 1 which one of the following is right and what exactly is the difference in the following methods as all print the value?
Method 1 :
Integer p = new Integer(1);
Method 2 :
Integer p = 1;
Method 3 :
Integer p = new Integer("1");
Using method three I got the following warning :
Note: HelloWorld.java uses or overrides a deprecated API.
Note: Recompile with -Xlint:deprecation for details
Integer objects are immutable, so you cannot modify the value once they have been created. You will need to create a new Integer and replace the existing one.
If your object is a String , then you can use the Integer. valueOf() method to convert it into a simple int : int i = Integer. valueOf((String) object);
Integer sum = Integer. valueOf(new Integer(2). intValue()+new Integer(4).
You skipped the intended solution:
Integer p = Integer.valueOf(1);
This pattern is known as Factory method pattern. One may ask what the benefit of this method is. Luckily, the implementation of class Integer is open-source, so let's take a look:
public static Integer valueOf(int i) {
if (i >= IntegerCache.low && i <= IntegerCache.high)
return IntegerCache.cache[i + (-IntegerCache.low)];
return new Integer(i);
}
There seems to be some kind of Integer-value cache. If one requests an Integer with a value within the cache-range, Java does not create a new object, but returns a previously created one. This works because Integers are immutable. One can even control the upper cache limit with the system property java.lang.Integer.IntegerCache.high=....
And why do the other two methods of creating an Integer generate a warning? Because they were set deprecated with Java 9.
Integer#Integer(int value):
Deprecated. It is rarely appropriate to use this constructor. The static factory
valueOf(int)is generally a better choice, as it is likely to yield significantly better space and time performance. [...]
Integer#Integer(String s):
Deprecated. It is rarely appropriate to use this constructor. Use
parseInt(String)to convert a string to aintprimitive, or usevalueOf(String)to convert a string to anIntegerobject. [...]
And just for completeness, here is the part for Integer.valueOf(int i):
Returns an
Integerinstance representing the specifiedintvalue. If a newIntegerinstance is not required, this method should generally be used in preference to the constructorInteger(int), as this method is likely to yield significantly better space and time performance by caching frequently requested values. This method will always cache values in the range-128to127, inclusive, and may cache other values outside of this range.
EDIT 1: Thanks to @VGR mentioning that
Integer p = 1;
is equivilant to
Integer p = Integer.valueOf(1);
This, however, is only true for int-values between -128 and 127. The behaviour is defined in JLS §5.1.7:
[...] If the value
pbeing boxed is the result of evaluating a constant expression (§15.28) of typeboolean,char,short,int, orlong, and the result istrue,false, a character in the range'\u0000'to'\u007f'inclusive, or an integer in the range-128to127inclusive, then letaandbbe the results of any two boxing conversions ofp. It is always the case thata == b.
EDIT 2: Thanks to @DorianGray, who brought the following to my attention.
While not in the JLS, the version of javac I am using (9.0.4) does compile the boxing down to Integer.valueOf(...); as it is shown in this answer by Adam Rosenfield.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With