To count a regex pattern multiple times in a given string, use the method len(re. findall(pattern, string)) that returns the number of matching substrings or len([*re. finditer(pattern, text)]) that unpacks all matching substrings into a list and returns the length of it as well.
This method, added in Java 9, returns a sequential stream of match results, allowing us to count the matches more easily: long count = countEmailMatcher. results() . count(); assertEquals(3, count);
The curly brackets are used to match exactly n instances of the proceeding character or pattern. For example, "/x{2}/" matches "xx".
JavaScript RegExp test() The test() method tests for a match in a string. If it finds a match, it returns true, otherwise it returns false.
tl;dr: Generic Pattern Counter
// THIS IS WHAT YOU NEED
const count = (str) => {
const re = /YOUR_PATTERN_HERE/g
return ((str || '').match(re) || []).length
}
For those that arrived here looking for a generic way to count the number of occurrences of a regex pattern in a string, and don't want it to fail if there are zero occurrences, this code is what you need. Here's a demonstration:
/*
* Example
*/
const count = (str) => {
const re = /[a-z]{3}/g
return ((str || '').match(re) || []).length
}
const str1 = 'abc, def, ghi'
const str2 = 'ABC, DEF, GHI'
console.log(`'${str1}' has ${count(str1)} occurrences of pattern '/[a-z]{3}/g'`)
console.log(`'${str2}' has ${count(str2)} occurrences of pattern '/[a-z]{3}/g'`)
Original Answer
The problem with your initial code is that you are missing the global identifier:
>>> 'hi there how are you'.match(/\s/g).length;
4
Without the g
part of the regex it will only match the first occurrence and stop there.
Also note that your regex will count successive spaces twice:
>>> 'hi there'.match(/\s/g).length;
2
If that is not desirable, you could do this:
>>> 'hi there'.match(/\s+/g).length;
1
As mentioned in my earlier answer, you can use RegExp.exec()
to iterate over all matches and count each occurrence; the advantage is limited to memory only, because on the whole it's about 20% slower than using String.match()
.
var re = /\s/g,
count = 0;
while (re.exec(text) !== null) {
++count;
}
return count;
(('a a a').match(/b/g) || []).length; // 0
(('a a a').match(/a/g) || []).length; // 3
Based on https://stackoverflow.com/a/48195124/16777 but fixed to actually work in zero-results case.
('my string'.match(/\s/g) || []).length;
Here is a similar solution to @Paolo Bergantino's answer, but with modern operators. I'll explain below.
const matchCount = (str, re) => {
return str?.match(re)?.length ?? 0;
};
// usage
let numSpaces = matchCount(undefined, /\s/g);
console.log(numSpaces); // 0
numSpaces = matchCount("foobarbaz", /\s/g);
console.log(numSpaces); // 0
numSpaces = matchCount("foo bar baz", /\s/g);
console.log(numSpaces); // 2
?.
is the optional chaining operator. It allows you to chain calls as deep as you want without having to worry about whether there is an undefined/null along the way. Think of str?.match(re)
as
if (str !== undefined && str !== null) {
return str.match(re);
} else {
return undefined;
}
This is slightly different from @Paolo Bergantino's. Theirs is written like this: (str || '')
. That means if str
is falsy, return ''
. 0 is falsy. document.all is falsy. In my opinion, if someone were to pass those into this function as a string, it would probably be because of programmer error. Therefore, I'd rather be informed I'm doing something non-sensible than troubleshoot why I keep on getting a length of 0.
??
is the nullish coalescing operator. Think of it as ||
but more specific. If the left hand side of ||
evaluates to falsy, it executes the right-hand side. But ??
only executes if the left-hand side is undefined or null.
Keep in mind, the nullish coalescing operator in ?.length ?? 0
will return the same thing as using ?.length || 0
. The difference is, if length
returns 0, it won't execute the right-hand side... but the result is going to be 0 whether you use ||
or ??
.
Honestly, in this situation I would probably change it to ||
because more JavaScript developers are familiar with that operator. Maybe someone could enlighten me on benefits of ??
vs ||
in this situation, if any exist.
Lastly, I changed the signature so the function can be used for any regex.
Oh, and here is a typescript version:
const matchCount = (str: string, re: RegExp) => {
return str?.match(re)?.length ?? 0;
};
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With