In my application, I have a NSFetchedResultsController
to load Core Data objects in a UITableView.
The fetch request associated with this FRC uses the new viewContext
property available for the NSPersistentContainer
(iOS10).
When I select a cell, I pass the Core Data object to a new ViewController. This new VC still uses the viewContext.
From this ViewController, I can update the Core Data object from ViewControllers presented modally. To do so, I use newBackgroundContext()
for the modal ViewControllers. I can save the update Core Data object without any issue.
The problem is that the FRC is not automatically updated with the update Core Data object from the background context. It is as if the viewContext was not receivng and handling the Core Data object updates.
If I set automaticallyMergesChangesFromParent
to true for the viewContext (app wide), the FRC gets the updated Core Data object when I save the background context. From my understanding, the viewContext should manage the merge of data automatically. The documentation describes the viewContext with: "This context is configured to be generational and to automatically consume save notifications from other contexts."
Can you clarify how to handle the different contexts with a NSFetchedResultsController?
You're seeing the correct behavior. If you want your viewContext to automatically pick up changes from other contexts, including ones created by newBackgroundContext()
, you have to set automaticallyMergesChangesFromParent
to true
.
I agree that the docs are confusing on that point, "...and to automatically consume save notifications from other contexts."
Automatically merge changes from parent needs to set on the viewContext like this:
persistentContainer.viewContext.automaticallyMergesChangesFromParent = true
I haven't run into this directly, but your issue strikes me as odd if the newBackgroundContext were in fact layered under the viewContext since any save from the new context would only update the viewContext, which would also have to do its own save to get the changes to the persistent store (which you say is occurring properly). Based on that suspicion, I looked at the developer docs where Apple says:
Invoking this method (newBackgroundContext() ) causes the persistent container to create and return a new NSManagedObjectContext with the concurrencyType set to privateQueueConcurrencyType. This new context will be associated with the NSPersistentStoreCoordinator directly and is set to consume NSManagedObjectContextDidSave broadcasts automatically.
Thus, it would not be in a parent - child relationship with the viewContext. Based on the guidance, it seems the new context would be notified of changes by the old, but not vice versa, so you'd have to do a refresh on the viewContext when the new context changes, which you could do programmatically if you can track that in your code or perhaps use one of the change notifications in NSManagedObjectsContext to trigger the action.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With