I have an async method inside a portable class library with this signature:
private async Task<T> _Fetch<T>(Uri uri)
It fetches a resource that is cast back as a concrete type T.
I'm working with a 3rd party cache library (Akavache) that requires a Func<T>
as one of the parameters and have tried to do so in this manner:
await this.CacheProvider.GetOrCreateObject<T>(key, async () => await _Fetch<T>(uri), cacheExpiry);
This results in the error:
Cannot convert async lambda expression to delegate type '
System.Func<T>
'. An async lambda expression may returnvoid
,Task
orTask<T>
, none of which are convertible to 'System.Func<T>
'.
I've tried various permutations of Func<T>
assignment without any luck, the only way I can get the code to work is to make the Func<T>
blocking:
await this.CacheProvider.GetOrCreateObject<T>(key, () => _Fetch<T>(uri).Result, cacheExpiry);
which deadlocks my app.
Any pointers on where I'm going astray?
No can do. When someone expects a Func<T> f
you can assume it will be invoked with something like result = f()
- i.e., it does not know about async behavior. If you cheat it by using .Result
like you have - it will deadlock on UI thread because it wants to schedule the code after await
(in _Fetch) on the UI thread, but you have already blocked it with .Result
.
Async lambda can be passed to Action
since it has no return value - or to Func<Task>
or Func<Task<T>>
.
Looking at your case, the GetOrCreateObject
appears to be calling GetOrFetchObject
. One of the GetOrFetchObject
overloads accepts a Func<Task<T>>
. You can try calling that method with your async lambda and see if it helps.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With