Originally I got this error:
The specified child already has a parent. You must call removeView() on the child's parent first
at
customSection.addView(customLayout);
So I added
((LinearLayout)customLayout.getParent()).removeView(customLayout);
and now get
java.lang.NullPointerException
So if the child has a parent, and I must first remove the child from the parent, why does getParent() return null?
I have an abstract fragment that allows derived classes to supply a custom layout for the list adapter. Relevant code:
Binding:
public void bind(DataObject row) {
View customLayout = getChildItemView(row);
if (customLayout != null) {
((LinearLayout) customLayout.getParent()).removeView(customLayout);
customSection.removeAllViews();
customSection.addView(customLayout);
customSection.setVisibility(View.VISIBLE);
} else {
customLayout.setVisibility(View.INVISIBLE);
}
}
protected View getChildItemView(CommonRow row) {
if (parentView == null) {
parentView = (LinearLayout) LayoutInflater.from(getActivity())
.inflate(R.layout.list_item_custom_section,
new LinearLayout(getActivity()), true);
label = (TextView) parentView.findViewById(R.id.txtData1Label);
value = (TextView) parentView.findViewById(R.id.txtData1Value);
}
label.setText("Minimum");
value.setText(manager.formatMoney(((SpecificDataRow) row).minimum));
return parentView;
}
I've also tried inflater.inflate(R.layout.list_item_custom_section, null)
... false, null / false, what gives?
EDIT:
@allprog, I knew some cleanup was needed. I wrote this at the end of the day somewhat in a hurry. I have since cleaned up the code, and separated out the binding and inflating of the view. Cleaned up code:
private class ViewHolder {
....
public ViewHolder(View v) {
Butterknife.inject(this, v);
View custom = createCustomView(customSection);
if (custom != null) {
customSection.setVisibility(View.VISIBLE);
customSection.addView(custom);
}
}
public void bind(CommonRow row) {
......
bindCustomView(row, customSection);
}
}
Child class:
@Override
protected View createCustomView(ViewGroup parent) {
return LayoutInflater.from(getActivity()).inflate(R.layout.list_item_custom_section, parent, false);
}
@Override
protected void bindCustomView(CommonRow row, ViewGroup section) {
TextView label = Views.findById(section, R.id.txtData1Label);
TextView value = Views.findById(section, R.id.txtData1Value);
label.setText("Minimum");
value.setText(manager.formatMoney(((SpecificRow) row).minimum));
}
suitianshi got it first, with my original [unkempt] code that was the solution.
try this:
public void bind(DataObject row) {
View customLayout = getChildItemView(row);
if (customLayout != null) {
if(customLayout.getParent() != null) {
((LinearLayout)customLayout.getParent()).removeView(customLayout);
}
customSection.removeAllViews();
customSection.addView(customLayout);
customSection.setVisibility(View.VISIBLE);
} else {
customLayout.setVisibility(View.INVISIBLE);
}
}
I have read related source code, getParent
should return non-null value when view
has a parent. You should make sure it actually has a parent before casting and calling removeView
Wish this helps.
source code :
in View
:
public final ViewParent getParent() {
return mParent;
}
in ViewGroup.addViewInner
if (child.getParent() != null) {
throw new IllegalStateException("The specified child already has a parent. " +
"You must call removeView() on the child's parent first.");
}
As I can see your parentView
is a field variable, this is the key. So what I suspect is really going on:
First call of bind()
: you creating parentView
and it is not have a parent yet, customSection.addView(customLayout);
works fine, but after you added a check for parent it fails here.
Second call of bind()
: parentView
is now have a parent and your added check should work now, but you failed at the previous step. Without a check you are failing here with exception in title.
Solution: check for the presence of parent and remove it only if necessery.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With