Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Conditionally ignoring tests in JUnit 4

OK, so the @Ignore annotation is good for marking that a test case shouldn't be run.

However, sometimes I want to ignore a test based on runtime information. An example might be if I have a concurrency test that needs to be run on a machine with a certain number of cores. If this test were run on a uniprocessor machine, I don't think it would be correct to just pass the test (since it hasn't been run), and it certainly wouldn't be right to fail the test and break the build.

So I want to be able to ignore tests at runtime, as this seems like the right outcome (since the test framework will allow the build to pass but record that the tests weren't run). I'm fairly sure that the annotation won't give me this flexibility, and suspect that I'll need to manually create the test suite for the class in question. However, the documentation doesn't mention anything about this and looking through the API it's also not clear how this would be done programmatically (i.e. how do I programatically create an instance of Test or similar that is equivalent to that created by the @Ignore annotation?).

If anyone has done something similar in the past, or has a bright idea of how else I could go about this, I'd be happy to hear about it.

like image 312
Andrzej Doyle Avatar asked Nov 06 '09 17:11

Andrzej Doyle


People also ask

Can you ignore test based on runtime information?

OK, so the @Ignore annotation is good for marking that a test case shouldn't be run. However, sometimes I want to ignore a test based on runtime information. An example might be if I have a concurrency test that needs to be run on a machine with a certain number of cores.

Why is JUnit ignoring tests?

Sometimes it so happens that our code is not completely ready while running a test case. As a result, the test case fails. The @Ignore annotation helps in this scenario.


2 Answers

The JUnit way is to do this at run-time is org.junit.Assume.

 @Before  public void beforeMethod() {      org.junit.Assume.assumeTrue(someCondition());      // rest of setup.  } 

You can do it in a @Before method or in the test itself, but not in an @After method. If you do it in the test itself, your @Before method will get run. You can also do it within @BeforeClass to prevent class initialization.

An assumption failure causes the test to be ignored.

Edit: To compare with the @RunIf annotation from junit-ext, their sample code would look like this:

@Test public void calculateTotalSalary() {     assumeThat(Database.connect(), is(notNull()));     //test code below. } 

Not to mention that it is much easier to capture and use the connection from the Database.connect() method this way.

like image 124
Yishai Avatar answered Sep 18 '22 15:09

Yishai


You should checkout Junit-ext project. They have RunIf annotation that performs conditional tests, like:

@Test @RunIf(DatabaseIsConnected.class) public void calculateTotalSalary() {     //your code there }  class DatabaseIsConnected implements Checker {    public boolean satisify() {         return Database.connect() != null;    } } 

[Code sample taken from their tutorial]

like image 34
notnoop Avatar answered Sep 17 '22 15:09

notnoop